• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰西部地区胰腺手术的质量改进通过集中化实现。

Quality improvement of pancreatic surgery by centralization in the western part of the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul;18(7):1821-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1511-4. Epub 2011 May 5.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-010-1511-4
PMID:21544657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3115061/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Centralization of pancreatic surgery in high-volume hospitals is under debate in many countries. In the western part of the Netherlands, the professional network of surgical oncologists agreed to centralize all pancreatic surgery from 2006 in two high-volume hospitals. Our aim is to evaluate whether centralization of pancreatic surgery has improved clinical outcomes and has changed referral patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre West (CCCW) of all 249 patients who had a resection for suspected pancreatic cancer between 1996 and 2008 in the western part of the Netherlands were analyzed. Multivariable modeling was used to evaluate survival for 3 time periods; 1996-2000, 2001-2005 (introduction of quality standards), and 2006-2008 (after centralization). In addition, the differences in referral pattern were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 2006, all pancreatic surgery was centralized in 2 hospitals. The 2-year survival rate increased after centralization from 39% to 55% (P =.09) for all patients who had a pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer. After adjustment for age, tumor location, stage, histology, and adjuvant treatment, the latter period was significantly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.34-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Centralization of pancreatic surgery was successful and has resulted in improved clinical outcomes in the western part of the Netherlands, demonstrating the effectiveness of centralization.

摘要

背景

在许多国家,胰腺手术的集中化在高容量医院中受到争议。在荷兰西部,外科肿瘤学家的专业网络同意自 2006 年起将所有胰腺手术集中在两家高容量医院进行。我们的目的是评估胰腺手术的集中化是否改善了临床结果并改变了转诊模式。

材料和方法

分析了荷兰西部综合癌症中心(CCCW)在 1996 年至 2008 年间所有 249 例疑似胰腺癌患者接受切除术的数据。使用多变量模型评估了 3 个时间段的生存率:1996-2000 年、2001-2005 年(引入质量标准)和 2006-2008 年(集中化后)。此外,还分析了转诊模式的差异。

结果

自 2006 年以来,所有胰腺手术都集中在 2 家医院进行。所有接受胰腺切除术治疗胰腺癌的患者的 2 年生存率在集中化后从 39%提高到 55%(P =.09)。调整年龄、肿瘤位置、分期、组织学和辅助治疗后,后一时期与生存率的提高显著相关(风险比[HR] 0.50;95%置信区间[95%CI] 0.34-0.73)。

结论

胰腺手术的集中化在荷兰西部取得了成功,并导致临床结果的改善,证明了集中化的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1435/3115061/855510d0e546/10434_2010_1511_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1435/3115061/fa24e7326d9e/10434_2010_1511_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1435/3115061/855510d0e546/10434_2010_1511_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1435/3115061/fa24e7326d9e/10434_2010_1511_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1435/3115061/855510d0e546/10434_2010_1511_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality improvement of pancreatic surgery by centralization in the western part of the Netherlands.荷兰西部地区胰腺手术的质量改进通过集中化实现。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul;18(7):1821-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1511-4. Epub 2011 May 5.
2
Effect of centralization and regionalization of pancreatic surgery on resection rates and survival.胰腺手术的集中化和区域化对切除率和生存率的影响。
Br J Surg. 2021 Jul 23;108(7):826-833. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa146.
3
Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival.胰腺癌手术集中化对切除率和生存率的影响。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jul;101(8):1000-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9468. Epub 2014 May 20.
4
Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands.胰腺切除术后的医院手术量与死亡率:一项系统综述及对荷兰干预措施的评估
Ann Surg. 2005 Dec;242(6):781-8, discussion 788-90. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000188462.00249.36.
5
Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe.欧洲的胰腺外科集中化。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):2081-2092. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04215-y. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
6
Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery Improves Results: Review.胰腺外科集中化可改善疗效:综述
Scand J Surg. 2020 Mar;109(1):4-10. doi: 10.1177/1457496919900411. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
7
Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization.通过集中化改善胰腺癌患者的预后。
Br J Surg. 2011 Oct;98(10):1455-62. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7581. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
8
Impact of nationwide centralization of oesophageal, gastric, and pancreatic surgery on travel distance and experienced burden in the Netherlands.全国范围内食管、胃和胰腺手术的集中化对荷兰旅行距离和经验负担的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;48(2):348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.023. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
9
Modelling centralization of pancreatic surgery in a nationwide analysis.全国范围内胰腺手术集中化的建模分析。
Br J Surg. 2020 Oct;107(11):1510-1519. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11716. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
10
Pancreatic cancer surgery in elderly patients: Balancing between short-term harm and long-term benefit. A population-based study in the Netherlands.老年患者的胰腺癌手术:短期伤害与长期益处之间的平衡。荷兰的一项基于人群的研究。
Acta Oncol. 2016;55(3):278-85. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1105381. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between pancreatic cancer resection rate and survival at population level: systematic review.人群水平上胰腺癌切除率与生存率的关系:系统评价
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf007.
2
Defining Standards for Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Surgery in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes.定义加拿大安大略省肝胆管癌手术标准:基于人群的临床结局的队列研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Feb 1;238(2):157-165. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000885. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Is there variation between hospitals within each region in postoperative mortality for lung cancer surgery in France? A nationwide study from 2013 to 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.对加利福尼亚州重大癌症手术死亡率与医院手术量之间关系的认识是否产生了影响?:另一个十年的随访分析。
Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):472-83. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b47c79.
2
Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care.癌症手术的集中化:对患者获得最佳治疗的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4671-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1715. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
3
Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.
法国各地区内不同医院之间肺癌手术的术后死亡率是否存在差异?一项2013年至2020年的全国性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 14;10:1110977. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1110977. eCollection 2023.
4
Systematic review of prospective studies focused on regionalization of care in surgical oncology.系统评价聚焦于外科肿瘤学中照护区域化的前瞻性研究。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1699-1707. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01073-9. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
Impact of suspending minimum volume requirements for knee arthroplasty on hospitals in Germany: an uncontrolled before-after study.德国膝关节置换术暂停最低手术量要求对医院的影响:一项非对照前后研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05957-1.
6
Is Treatment at a High-volume Center Associated with an Improved Survival for Primary Malignant Bone Tumors?高容量中心治疗是否与原发性骨恶性肿瘤的生存改善相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):631-642. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001034.
7
An update on treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.胰腺腺癌治疗方案的最新进展。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Sep 25;11:1758835919875568. doi: 10.1177/1758835919875568. eCollection 2019.
8
Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe.欧洲的胰腺外科集中化。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):2081-2092. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04215-y. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.优化胰腺癌手术的结果。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;16(1):11-26. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0112-1.
10
Volume-outcome revisited: The effect of hospital and surgeon volumes on multiple outcome measures in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.再探手术量与预后:医院及外科医生手术量对食管癌和胃癌手术多种预后指标的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0183955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183955. eCollection 2017.
胰腺切除术中医院手术量、系统临床资源与死亡率之间的关系。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Apr;208(4):520-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.019.
4
Centralization of esophageal cancer surgery: does it improve clinical outcome?食管癌手术的集中化:它能改善临床结局吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1789-98. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0458-9. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
5
Effect of hospital volume on margin status after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer.医院手术量对胰腺癌胰十二指肠切除术后切缘状态的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Oct;207(4):510-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.04.033. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
6
Effect of hospital type and volume on lymph node evaluation for gastric and pancreatic cancer.医院类型和规模对胃癌及胰腺癌淋巴结评估的影响
Arch Surg. 2008 Jul;143(7):671-8; discussion 678. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.7.671.
7
Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery.指导手术质量改进计划:癌症手术围手术期死亡率与长期生存率的比较
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;26(28):4626-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6356. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
8
Role of volume outcome data in assuring quality in HPB surgery.体积结果数据在保证肝胆胰外科质量中的作用。
HPB (Oxford). 2007;9(5):330-4. doi: 10.1080/13651820701611234.
9
Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy continues to determine length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality.外科医生进行胰十二指肠切除术的频率持续决定住院时间、住院费用和院内死亡率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Mar;12(3):442-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0442-2. Epub 2007 Dec 22.
10
High-volume versus low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustments based on clinical data.食管癌切除术的高手术量与低手术量:基于临床数据进行病例组合调整的重要作用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;15(1):80-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9673-4. Epub 2007 Nov 15.