Division of Vehicle Safety, Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jul;43(4):1570-80. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
Intersection crashes between cars and vulnerable road users (VRUs), such as pedestrians and bicyclists, often result in injuries and fatalities. Advanced driver assistance systems (ADASs) can prevent, or mitigate, these crashes. To derive functional requirements for such systems, an understanding of the underlying contributing factors and the context in which the crashes occur is essential. The aim of this study is to use microscopic and macroscopic crash data to explore the potential of information and warning providing ADASs, and then to derive functional sensor, collision detection, and human-machine interface (HMI) requirements. The microscopic data were obtained from the European project SafetyNet. Causation charts describing contributing factors for 60 car-to-VRU crashes had been compiled and were then also aggregated using the SafetyNet Accident Causation System (SNACS). The macroscopic data were obtained from the Swedish national crash database, STRADA. A total of 9702 crashes were analyzed. The results show that the most frequent contributing factor to the crashes was the drivers' failure to observe VRUs due to reduced visibility, reduced awareness, and/or insufficient comprehension. An ADAS should therefore help drivers to observe the VRUs in time and to enhance their ability to interpret the development of events in the near future. The system should include a combination of imminent and cautionary collision warnings, with additional support in the form of information about intersection geometry and traffic regulations. The warnings should be deployed via an in-vehicle HMI and according to the likelihood of crash risk. The system should be able to operate under a variety of weather and light conditions. It should have the capacity to support drivers when their view is obstructed by physical objects. To address problems that vehicle-based sensors may face in this regard, the use of cooperative systems is recommended.
车辆与弱势道路使用者(VRU)(如行人和骑自行车的人)之间的交叉事故经常导致受伤和死亡。先进的驾驶员辅助系统(ADAS)可以预防或减轻这些事故。为了为这些系统推导功能要求,必须了解潜在的促成因素以及事故发生的背景。本研究旨在使用微观和宏观碰撞数据来探索信息和警告提供 ADAS 的潜力,然后推导出功能传感器、碰撞检测和人机界面(HMI)要求。微观数据来自欧洲项目 SafetyNet 获得。已经编制了描述 60 起汽车与 VRU 碰撞事故促成因素的因果图,然后使用 SafetyNet 事故因果系统(SNACS)对其进行了汇总。宏观数据来自瑞典国家碰撞数据库 STRADA。总共分析了 9702 起碰撞事故。结果表明,导致碰撞的最常见促成因素是驾驶员由于能见度降低、意识降低和/或理解不足而未能观察到 VRU。因此,ADAS 应该帮助驾驶员及时观察 VRU,并增强他们解释未来附近事件发展的能力。该系统应包括即将发生和警告性碰撞警告的组合,以及有关交叉口几何形状和交通规则的信息的额外支持。警告应通过车载 HMI 根据碰撞风险的可能性进行部署。该系统应能够在各种天气和光照条件下运行。它应该有能力在驾驶员的视线被物理物体遮挡时为驾驶员提供支持。为了解决车辆传感器在这方面可能面临的问题,建议使用合作系统。