Driscoll R, Page Y, Lassarre S, Ehrlich J
Centre Européen d'Etudes de Sécurité et d'Analyse des Risques, Nanterre, France.
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:485-505.
This paper presents the potential safety benefits of the experimental French LAVIA Intelligent Speed Adaptation system, according to road network and system mode, based on observed driving speeds, distributions of crash severity and crash injury risk. Results are given for car frontal and side impacts that together, represent 80% of all serious and fatal injuries in France. Of the three system modes tested (advisory, driver select, mandatory), our results suggest that driver select would most significantly reduce serious injuries and death. We estimate this 100% utilization of cars equipped with this type of speed adaptation system would decrease injury rates by 6% to 16% over existing conditions depending on the type of crash (frontal or side) and road environment considered. Some limitations associated with the analysis are also identified. LAVIA is the acronym for Limiteur s'Adaptant à la VItesse Autorisée, a French Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA) project that was set up towards the end of 1999. At the time, 1998 French national road safety statistics recorded 8437 road related deaths, a figure which had shown virtually no positive evolution since 1994. Detailed analysis of the contributory factors involved in fatal road crashes highlighted the time-honoured crash and injury causation mechanisms - alcohol, speed and seatbelts. Of the three, excessive speed (over and above the posted speed limit) was a contributory factor in half of all fatal crashes Inappropriate behaviour such as excessive speeding can be dealt with either by legislative or driver-incentive programmes. The first of these two solutions involves the introduction of new legislation and/or the enforcement of existing laws. This is the domain of Public Authorities and will not be discussed in detail here. Alternatively, incentive schemes can involve the implementation of speed related driver assistance systems, categorised according to their voluntary or mandatory character and the degree of autonomy proposed to or imposed on the driver. The LAVIA project set out to address several possible combinations of these two factors. The generic term Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA) encompasses a wide range of different technologies aimed at improving road safety by reducing traffic speed and homogenising traffic flow, within the limit of posted speed limits. "Fixed speed limit" systems inform the vehicle of the posted speed limit whereas "variable speed limit" systems take into account certain locations on the road network where a speed below the posted limit is desirable, such as sharp curves, pedestrian crossings or crash black spots. Taken one step further, speed limit systems may also take into account weather and traffic flow conditions. These systems are known as "dynamic speed limit" systems and benefit from real time updates for a specific location. The different ISA systems are generally characterised by the degree of freedom of choice given to the driver in moderating his or her speed. Speed limit technologies may be advisory (informing drivers of the current speed limit and speed limit changes), voluntary (allowing the driver to decide whether or not to implement speed limitation) or mandatory (imposing the current speed limit). The information supplied may be provided by way of the road infrastructure (and associated equipment), may be acquired autonomously by the vehicle or may be based on an interaction between the infrastructure and the vehicle. Even the most basic of these systems should be considered as a very useful driver aid, helping the driver to stay within the posted speed limit, avoiding "unnecessary" speeding fines through inattention, modelling driver behaviour through the long term reduction of speeds and reducing driver workload by limiting visual speedometer controls. Vehicle-based ISA systems should not be confused with internal systems. These latter systems rely upon the driver entering the desired travel speed, which is then maintained by cruise control or set as a maximum value by automatic speed regulators. Although these systems will not be discussed in detail here, it should be noted that the engine management technologies that they employ are a vital component of ISA systems.
本文根据道路网络和系统模式,基于观察到的驾驶速度、碰撞严重程度分布以及碰撞伤害风险,介绍了法国实验性LAVIA智能速度适应系统的潜在安全益处。给出了汽车正面和侧面碰撞的结果,这两种碰撞加起来占法国所有严重和致命伤害的80%。在测试的三种系统模式(建议模式、驾驶员选择模式、强制模式)中,我们的结果表明驾驶员选择模式能最显著地减少严重伤害和死亡。我们估计,100%配备这种速度适应系统的汽车,根据所考虑的碰撞类型(正面或侧面)和道路环境,与现有情况相比,伤害率将降低6%至16%。还确定了与该分析相关的一些局限性。LAVIA是Limiteur s'Adaptant à la VItesse Autorisée的首字母缩写,这是一个法国智能速度适应(ISA)项目,于1999年底启动。当时,1998年法国国家道路安全统计记录了8437起道路相关死亡事故,自1994年以来这个数字几乎没有积极的变化。对致命道路碰撞所涉及的促成因素进行的详细分析突出了由来已久的碰撞和伤害因果机制——酒精、速度和安全带。在这三者中,超速(超过规定速度限制)是所有致命碰撞中一半事故的促成因素。诸如超速等不当行为可以通过立法或驾驶员激励计划来处理。这两种解决方案中的第一种涉及引入新立法和/或执行现有法律。这是公共当局的领域,在此不再详细讨论。或者,激励计划可以涉及实施与速度相关的驾驶员辅助系统,根据其自愿或强制性质以及给予或强加给驾驶员的自主程度进行分类。LAVIA项目着手解决这两个因素的几种可能组合。通用术语智能速度适应(ISA)涵盖了广泛的不同技术,旨在通过在规定速度限制范围内降低交通速度和使交通流均匀化来提高道路安全。“固定速度限制”系统向车辆告知规定速度限制,而“可变速度限制”系统考虑道路网络上某些需要低于规定速度行驶的位置,例如急转弯、人行横道或事故黑点。更进一步,速度限制系统还可以考虑天气和交通流状况。这些系统被称为“动态速度限制”系统,并受益于特定位置的实时更新。不同的ISA系统通常以给予驾驶员调节其速度的选择自由度来表征。速度限制技术可以是建议性的(告知驾驶员当前速度限制和速度限制变化)、自愿性的(允许驾驶员决定是否实施速度限制)或强制性的(强制实施当前速度限制)。所提供的信息可以通过道路基础设施(及相关设备)提供,可以由车辆自主获取,也可以基于基础设施与车辆之间的交互。即使是这些系统中最基本的系统也应被视为非常有用的驾驶员辅助工具,帮助驾驶员保持在规定速度限制内,避免因注意力不集中而产生“不必要”的超速罚款,通过长期降低速度来塑造驾驶员行为,并通过限制视觉速度计控制来减轻驾驶员工作量。基于车辆的ISA系统不应与内部系统混淆。后一种系统依赖驾驶员输入期望的行驶速度,然后由巡航控制保持该速度或由自动速度调节器将其设置为最大值。虽然这里不会详细讨论这些系统,但应该注意的是,它们所采用的发动机管理技术是ISA系统的重要组成部分。