Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像上的脑微出血:1.5T 与 7T 的比较。

Cerebral microbleeds on MR imaging: comparison between 1.5 and 7T.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jun-Jul;32(6):1043-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2450. Epub 2011 May 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The detection of microbleeds differs strongly between studies, due to differences in scan protocol. This study aims to compare the visualization of microbleeds with 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T with 3D dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients (29 male; mean age, 58 ± 12 years) with atherosclerotic disease from the Second Manifestations of ARTerial Disease study were included. 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T and dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T were done in all patients. The presence and number of definite microbleeds were recorded on minimal intensity projections. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was assessed with Cohen κ test and the ICC. The difference in presence and number of microbleeds was tested with the McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

The interobserver ICC at 7T was 0.61 and the intraobserver ICC was 0.94, whereas at 1.5T the interobserver ICC was 0.50 and the intraobserver ICC was 0.59. Microbleeds were detected in significantly more patients on 7T (50%) than on 1.5T scans (21%) (P = .001). The number of microbleeds was also higher at 7T (median, 0.5; range, 0-5) than on 1.5T (median, 0.0; range, 0-6) (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

3D dual-echo T2*-weighted imaging at 7T results in better and more reliable detection of microbleeds compared with 3D T2*-weighted imaging at 1.5T.

摘要

背景与目的

由于扫描方案的差异,不同研究之间对微出血的检测结果差异很大。本研究旨在比较在 1.5T 上进行的 3D T2*-加权成像与在 7T 上进行的 3D 双回波 T2*-加权成像对微出血的显示效果。

材料与方法

共纳入 34 例动脉粥样硬化性疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者(29 例男性;平均年龄 58±12 岁),所有患者均进行了 1.5T 3D T2*-加权成像和 7T 双回波 T2*-加权成像。在最小强度投影图上记录明确微出血的存在和数量。采用 Cohen κ 检验和 ICC 评估观察者间和观察者内的可靠性。采用 McNemar 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较微出血的存在和数量差异。

结果

7T 时观察者间 ICC 为 0.61,观察者内 ICC 为 0.94,而 1.5T 时观察者间 ICC 为 0.50,观察者内 ICC 为 0.59。7T 时可检测到微出血的患者比例显著高于 1.5T(50%比 21%,P=0.001)。7T 时微出血的数量也高于 1.5T(中位数 0.5;范围 0-5)(中位数 0.0;范围 0-6)(P=0.002)。

结论

与 1.5T 3D T2*-加权成像相比,7T 3D 双回波 T2*-加权成像可更好、更可靠地检测微出血。

相似文献

1
Cerebral microbleeds on MR imaging: comparison between 1.5 and 7T.磁共振成像上的脑微出血:1.5T 与 7T 的比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jun-Jul;32(6):1043-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2450. Epub 2011 May 5.
10
Choice of echo time on GRE T2*-weighted MRI influences the classification of brain microbleeds.
Clin Radiol. 2010 May;65(5):391-4. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A closer look: pediatric neuroimaging at 7T.深入观察:7T 下的儿科神经成像
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1007/s00247-025-06231-4.
7
Characteristics of stroke after liver and kidney transplantation.肝肾移植后中风的特征
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1123518. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1123518. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

3
Brain microbleeds.脑微出血
Pract Neurol. 2010 Apr;10(2):94-100. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.206086.
7
Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation.脑微出血:检测与解读指南
Lancet Neurol. 2009 Feb;8(2):165-74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70013-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验