Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, Jing-wu Road No. 324, 250021, Jinan, Shandong, PR China.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2013 Jun;23(2):121-7. doi: 10.1007/s00062-012-0185-7. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
We aimed to compare images obtained with an Enhanced 3D multi-echo GRE T2*-weighted angiography (ESWAN) sequence with those obtained with a susceptibility-weighted imaging-spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SWI-SPGR) sequence and a two-dimensional (2D) T2*-weighted gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence for the description of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in hypertensive patients (elderly people).
A total of 273 elderly hypertensive patients were imaged in a 3.0-T MR scanner using ESWAN, SWI-SPGR, and 2D T2*-weighted GRE sequence, respectively. The presence, number, and location of CMBs and scanning and postprocessing time were recorded for both sequences, and the differences were tested using nonparametric McNemar and Friedman tests.
CMBs were detected by 2D T2*-weighted GRE images in 54 participants, SWI-SPGR images in 83 participants, and ESWAN images in 88 participants. The participants with CMBs detected by 2D T2*-weighted GRE sequence were fewer than those with CMBs detected by SWI-SPGR or ESWAN sequences (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between SWI-SPGR and ESWAN sequences to detect the CMBs in number (P > 0.05). Among the participants with CMBs visualized in both sequences, most patients had CMBs in the subcortical white matter and at deep locations. The participants who had CMBs in the infratentorial region were fewer. The acquisition time of ESWAN images was slightly longer than that of SWI-SPGR images.
ESWAN sequence was not superior to SWI-SPGR sequence in depicting CMBs at 3.0-T MR, but both of these sequences were superior to 2D T2*-weighted GRE sequence.
我们旨在比较增强型 3D 多回波 GRE T2*-加权血管造影术(ESWAN)序列与磁化率加权成像-扰相梯度回波(SWI-SPGR)序列和二维(2D)T2*-加权梯度回波(GRE)序列获得的图像,以描述高血压患者(老年人)的脑微出血(CMB)。
在 3.0-T MR 扫描仪上,分别使用 ESWAN、SWI-SPGR 和 2D T2*-加权 GRE 序列对 273 名老年高血压患者进行成像。记录两种序列下 CMB 的存在、数量和位置以及扫描和后处理时间,并使用非参数 McNemar 和 Friedman 检验进行检验。
2D T2*-加权 GRE 图像检测到 54 名参与者存在 CMB,SWI-SPGR 图像检测到 83 名参与者存在 CMB,ESWAN 图像检测到 88 名参与者存在 CMB。在 2D T2*-加权 GRE 序列检测到 CMB 的参与者少于在 SWI-SPGR 或 ESWAN 序列检测到 CMB 的参与者(P<0.05)。SWI-SPGR 和 ESWAN 序列在检测 CMB 数量方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。在两种序列都能显示 CMB 的参与者中,大多数患者的 CMB 位于皮质下白质和深部位置。幕下区域有 CMB 的患者较少。ESWAN 图像的采集时间略长于 SWI-SPGR 图像。
ESWAN 序列在 3.0-T MR 上显示 CMB 方面并不优于 SWI-SPGR 序列,但这两种序列均优于 2D T2*-加权 GRE 序列。