Venable N, Kelly P H
Preclinical Research, Sandoz, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;100(2):215-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02244409.
The effects of NMDA antagonists on passive avoidance learning, shock sensitivity and locomotor activity were examined. Pre-training administration of the antagonists 3-((+-)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) and (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine (MK-801) in mice and rats resulted in impaired performance in a retention test 24 h later. No such impairment resulted from immediate post-training administration of either compound in either species. In addition neither compound, given only before the retention test, reduced the retention latencies of mice. In rats CPP was similarly ineffective whereas MK-801 reduced retention latencies, but only at a dose which significantly elevated locomotor activity at the time of the retention test. As assessed by vocalization threshold in mice and by the proportion of animals vocalizing in response to the passive avoidance training shock, neither compound produced analgesia. The vocalization threshold was, in fact, slightly reduced by both compounds. MK-801, but not CPP, stimulated locomotor activity in mice. These results indicate that in the passive avoidance task activation of NMDA receptors is involved in memory formation, but is not critical for the maintenance of memory or its retrieval.
研究了N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂对被动回避学习、电击敏感性和运动活动的影响。在小鼠和大鼠中,于训练前给予拮抗剂3-((±)-2-羧基哌嗪-4-基)-丙基-1-膦酸(CPP)和(+)-5-甲基-10,11-二氢-5H-二苯并[a,d]环庚烯-5,10-亚胺(MK-801),导致24小时后的记忆保持测试表现受损。在这两个物种中,训练后立即给予这两种化合物均未导致此类损伤。此外,仅在记忆保持测试前给予这两种化合物,均未缩短小鼠的记忆保持潜伏期。在大鼠中,CPP同样无效,而MK-801缩短了记忆保持潜伏期,但仅在一个剂量下有效,该剂量在记忆保持测试时显著提高了运动活动。通过小鼠的发声阈值以及对被动回避训练电击做出发声反应的动物比例评估,这两种化合物均未产生镇痛作用。事实上,这两种化合物都使发声阈值略有降低。MK-801,但不是CPP,刺激了小鼠的运动活动。这些结果表明,在被动回避任务中,NMDA受体的激活参与记忆形成,但对记忆维持或检索并不关键。