Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit and UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), Box 296, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 May 6;11:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-62.
Minimising participant non-response in postal surveys helps to maximise the generalisability of the inferences made from the data collected. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of questionnaire length, personalisation and reminder type on postal survey response rate and quality and to compare the cost-effectiveness of the alternative survey strategies.
In a pilot study for a population study of travel behaviour, physical activity and the environment, 1000 participants sampled from the UK edited electoral register were randomly allocated using a 2×2 factorial design to receive one of four survey packs: a personally addressed long (24 page) questionnaire pack, a personally addressed short (15 page) questionnaire pack, a non-personally addressed long questionnaire pack or a non-personally addressed short questionnaire pack. Those who did not return a questionnaire were stratified by initial randomisation group and further randomised to receive either a full reminder pack or a reminder postcard. The effects of the survey design factors on response were examined using multivariate logistic regression.
An overall response rate of 17% was achieved. Participants who received the short version of the questionnaire were more likely to respond (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.07). In those participants who received a reminder, personalisation of the survey pack and reminder also increased the odds of response (OR=1.44, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.95). Item non-response was relatively low, but was significantly higher in the long questionnaire than the short (9.8% vs 5.8%; p=.04). The cost per additional usable questionnaire returned of issuing the reminder packs was £23.1 compared with £11.3 for the reminder postcards.
In contrast to some previous studies of shorter questionnaires, this trial found that shortening a relatively lengthy questionnaire significantly increased the response. Researchers should consider the trade off between the value of additional questions and a larger sample. If low response rates are expected, personalisation may be an important strategy to apply. Sending a full reminder pack to non-respondents appears a worthwhile, albeit more costly, strategy.
在邮寄调查中,尽量减少参与者的无回应有助于最大限度地推广从收集的数据中得出的推论。本研究的目的是检验问卷长度、个性化和提醒类型对邮寄调查响应率和质量的影响,并比较替代调查策略的成本效益。
在一项关于出行行为、身体活动和环境的人群研究的试点研究中,从英国编辑的选举登记册中抽取的 1000 名参与者采用 2×2 析因设计随机分配,接受四种调查包之一:个人地址长(24 页)问卷包、个人地址短(15 页)问卷包、非个人地址长问卷包或非个人地址短问卷包。未返回问卷的人按初始随机分组分层,进一步随机分配接受完整提醒包或提醒明信片。使用多变量逻辑回归检验调查设计因素对响应的影响。
总体响应率为 17%。收到短问卷的参与者更有可能做出回应(OR=1.48,95%CI 1.06 至 2.07)。在收到提醒的参与者中,调查包的个性化和提醒也增加了回应的可能性(OR=1.44,95%CI 1.01 至 1.95)。项目无响应率相对较低,但长问卷明显高于短问卷(9.8%对 5.8%;p=.04)。与一些先前较短问卷的研究相反,本试验发现缩短相对较长的问卷显著增加了响应。研究人员应考虑增加问题和更大样本的价值之间的权衡。如果预期响应率较低,则个性化可能是一个重要的应用策略。向未回复者发送完整的提醒包似乎是一种值得的、尽管成本更高的策略。