• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估至关重要:外科教学评估的经验教训。

Evaluation matters: lessons learned on the evaluation of surgical teaching.

机构信息

Education Evaluation, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2011;9 Suppl 1:S43-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.11.016. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2010.11.016
PMID:21549997
Abstract

The traditional system of academic promotion and tenure can make it difficult to reward those who excel at surgical teaching. A successful faculty evaluation process can provide the objective measures of teaching performance needed for performance appraisals and promotion decisions. Over the course of two decades, an extensive faculty evaluation process has been developed in the Department of Surgery at the University of Toronto. This paper presents some of the non-psychometric characteristics of that system. Faculty awareness of the evaluation process, the consistency of its application, trainee anonymity and the materiality of the results are described key factors of a faculty evaluation system that meets the assessment needs of individual teachers and raises the profile of teaching in surgical departments.

摘要

传统的学术晋升和终身教职制度可能难以奖励那些擅长外科教学的人。一个成功的教师评估过程可以为绩效评估和晋升决策提供教学表现的客观衡量标准。在过去的二十年中,多伦多大学外科系已经开发出了广泛的教师评估过程。本文介绍了该系统的一些非心理计量学特征。教师对评估过程的认识、其应用的一致性、学员匿名性和结果的重要性是满足个别教师评估需求并提高外科部门教学水平的教师评估系统的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Evaluation matters: lessons learned on the evaluation of surgical teaching.评估至关重要:外科教学评估的经验教训。
Surgeon. 2011;9 Suppl 1:S43-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.11.016. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
2
Evaluation of surgical faculty and surgical undergraduate teaching.外科教员及外科本科教学评估
Can J Surg. 1985 Jul;28(4):351-4.
3
A standards-based, peer-reviewed teaching award to enhance a medical school's teaching environment and inform the promotions process.一项基于标准、同行评审的教学奖项,旨在改善医学院的教学环境,并为晋升过程提供信息。
Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):870-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182584130.
4
Impact of objectively assessing surgeons' teaching on effective perioperative instructional behaviors.客观评估外科医生教学对有效围手术期教学行为的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Oct;148(10):915-22. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2144.
5
[Professor at the Chair of surgery--an expert in his field--a necessity!].外科教研室教授——该领域的专家——必不可少!
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1990 Sep;145(9):125-7.
6
Using the 360 degrees multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism.采用 360 度多源反馈模型评估教学和专业精神。
Med Teach. 2009 Dec;31(12):1073-80. doi: 10.3109/01421590802572775.
7
Evaluations of clinical faculty: the impact of level of learner and time of year.临床教员评估:学习者水平和一年中的时间的影响。
Teach Learn Med. 2002 Spring;14(2):87-91. doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1402_04.
8
Validation of the SETOC instrument -- Student evaluation of teaching in outpatient clinics.SETOC工具的验证——门诊教学学生评价
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Feb;12(1):55-69. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-2328-y. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
9
Ongoing faculty evaluations: developmental gain or just more pain?持续的教师评估:是发展进步还是徒增痛苦?
Curr Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;63(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2005.08.010.
10
Awarding faculty rank to non-tenured physician faculty in a consortium medical school.在一所联合医学院授予非终身制医师教员教职级别。
Fam Med. 2008 Jan;40(1):32-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to recognizing and rewarding clinician teachers' performances and achievements: a narrative review.优秀临床教师的特质以及认可和奖励临床教师表现与成就的障碍:一项叙述性综述。
Can Med Educ J. 2022 May 3;13(2):57-72. doi: 10.36834/cmej.73241. eCollection 2022 May.