• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物(比索洛尔与依那普利)顺序和类型对慢性心力衰竭患者结局和不良事件的影响:CIBIS-III 试验事后分析。

Influence of order and type of drug (bisoprolol vs. enalapril) on outcome and adverse events in patients with chronic heart failure: a post hoc analysis of the CIBIS-III trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, UPMC-Univ. Paris 06, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Jul;13(7):765-72. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr051. Epub 2011 May 6.

DOI:10.1093/eurjhf/hfr051
PMID:21551161
Abstract

AIMS

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and beta-blockers are associated with improved outcome in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). In this post hoc analysis of the CIBIS III trial, we examined the influence of the order of drug administration on clinical events and achieved dose. We also assessed the relations between dose levels and baseline variables or adverse events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the CIBIS III trial, 1010 patients (mean age: 72.4 years; mean ejection fraction: 28.8%; male: 68.2%) with stable CHF were randomized to up-titration of monotherapy with either bisoprolol (target dose 10 mg o.d.) or enalapril (target dose 10 mg b.i.d.) for 6 months, followed by their combination for 6-24 months. Endpoints were mortality or all-cause hospitalization, mortality alone and mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization. The study drug (ACE-I or beta-blocker) was last prescribed at ≥50% of target dose to significantly more patients for the first initiated drug in both treatment groups (both P< 0.001). Sixty per cent of endpoints were reached during the monotherapy phase and randomized treatment during monotherapy was not a predictor of the three assessed outcomes. Monotherapy phase was the strongest independent predictor of outcome (P< 0.0001 for all endpoints). Older age, NYHA class III, impaired renal function, lower body weight and blood pressure at baseline, and hypotension, bradycardia and heart failure during treatment were associated with the inability to reach high dose of both study drugs.

CONCLUSION

The order of drug administration plays an important role in whether CHF patients reach target doses of bisoprolol and enalapril. For both study drugs, the dose level reached was associated with baseline characteristics and adverse events. In CHF patients not treated with an ACE-I or a beta-blocker, the duration of monotherapy with either type of drug should be shorter than 6 months.

摘要

目的

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACE-Is)和β受体阻滞剂可改善慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的预后。在 CIBIS III 试验的事后分析中,我们研究了药物给药顺序对临床事件和达到剂量的影响。我们还评估了剂量水平与基线变量或不良事件之间的关系。

方法和结果

在 CIBIS III 试验中,1010 例(平均年龄:72.4 岁;平均射血分数:28.8%;男性:68.2%)稳定的 CHF 患者被随机分为两组,分别接受比索洛尔(目标剂量 10mg 每天一次)或依那普利(目标剂量 10mg 每天两次)单药滴定治疗 6 个月,随后联合治疗 6-24 个月。终点为死亡率或全因住院率、死亡率和死亡率或心血管住院率。在两个治疗组中,首次起始药物达到≥50%目标剂量的患者中,最后开出处方的研究药物(ACE-I 或β受体阻滞剂)显著更多(两组均 P<0.001)。60%的终点发生在单药治疗阶段,单药治疗期间的随机治疗不是三个评估结局的预测因素。单药治疗阶段是结局的最强独立预测因素(所有终点均 P<0.0001)。年龄较大、NYHA 心功能分级 III 级、肾功能受损、基线时体重和血压较低,以及治疗期间出现低血压、心动过缓和心力衰竭与无法达到两种研究药物的高剂量相关。

结论

药物给药顺序对 CHF 患者是否达到比索洛尔和依那普利的目标剂量起着重要作用。对于两种研究药物,达到的剂量水平与基线特征和不良事件相关。在未接受 ACE-I 或β受体阻滞剂治疗的 CHF 患者中,应将两种药物中任何一种的单药治疗时间缩短至 6 个月以下。

相似文献

1
Influence of order and type of drug (bisoprolol vs. enalapril) on outcome and adverse events in patients with chronic heart failure: a post hoc analysis of the CIBIS-III trial.药物(比索洛尔与依那普利)顺序和类型对慢性心力衰竭患者结局和不良事件的影响:CIBIS-III 试验事后分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Jul;13(7):765-72. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr051. Epub 2011 May 6.
2
Effect on survival and hospitalization of initiating treatment for chronic heart failure with bisoprolol followed by enalapril, as compared with the opposite sequence: results of the randomized Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) III.与相反治疗顺序相比,先用比索洛尔然后用依那普利起始治疗慢性心力衰竭对生存和住院的影响:随机化心脏衰竭比索洛尔研究(CIBIS)III的结果
Circulation. 2005 Oct 18;112(16):2426-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.582320. Epub 2005 Sep 4.
3
Comparison of treatment initiation with bisoprolol vs. enalapril in chronic heart failure patients: rationale and design of CIBIS-III.比索洛尔与依那普利起始治疗慢性心力衰竭患者的比较:CIBIS-III研究的理论依据与设计
Eur J Heart Fail. 2004 Jun;6(4):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2003.12.016.
4
Implications of CIBIS III: a commentary.《比索洛尔心力衰竭研究Ⅲ(CIBIS III)的启示:一篇评论》
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2005 Dec;6(3):115-20. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2005.017.
5
The effect of treatment with bisoprolol-first versus enalapril-first on cardiac structure and function in heart failure.比索洛尔优先治疗与依那普利优先治疗对心力衰竭中心脏结构和功能的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 24;144(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.04.040. Epub 2009 May 28.
6
Impact of statin therapy on clinical outcomes in chronic heart failure patients according to beta-blocker use: results of CIBIS II.根据β受体阻滞剂的使用情况,他汀类药物治疗对慢性心力衰竭患者临床结局的影响:CIBIS II研究结果
Cardiology. 2007;108(1):28-34. doi: 10.1159/000095629. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
7
Effect on mode of death of heart failure treatment started with bisoprolol followed by Enalapril, compared to the opposite order: results of the randomized CIBIS III trial.与依那普利后用比索洛尔起始治疗心力衰竭相比,比索洛尔后用依那普利起始治疗心力衰竭对死亡方式的影响:随机CIBIS III试验结果
Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Apr;29(2):89-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00185.x.
8
[Chronic heart failure and sudden death: the message of CIBIS-III].[慢性心力衰竭与猝死:CIBIS-III研究的启示]
Recenti Prog Med. 2007 Dec;98(12):638-45.
9
[Adaptation of guidelines for the treatment of chronic heart failure in a specialized heart failure clinic].[在一家专业心力衰竭诊所对慢性心力衰竭治疗指南的调整]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 Oct 31;114(19-20):833-9.
10
Clinical effects of initial 6 months monotherapy with bisoprolol versus enalapril in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. Data from the CIBIS III Trial.比索洛尔与依那普利初始6个月单药治疗对轻至中度慢性心力衰竭患者的临床疗效。来自CIBIS III试验的数据。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2008 Oct;22(5):399-405. doi: 10.1007/s10557-008-6116-9. Epub 2008 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Efficacy and Long-Term Outcomes of Beta-Blockers Alone or in Combination With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors in Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.β受体阻滞剂单独使用或与血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂联合使用治疗慢性心力衰竭的疗效比较及长期预后:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 23;16(11):e74329. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74329. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
The Efficacy and Safety of Bisoprolol in the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction with Cardiac Insufficiency.比索洛尔治疗心肌梗合并心力衰竭的疗效及安全性。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 25;2022:3098726. doi: 10.1155/2022/3098726. eCollection 2022.
3
Therapeutic Properties of Highly Selective β-blockers With or Without Additional Vasodilator Properties: Focus on Bisoprolol and Nebivolol in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.
高度选择性β受体阻滞剂的治疗特性,具有或不具有额外的血管扩张特性:以比索洛尔和奈必洛尔为例,用于心血管疾病患者。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Oct;36(5):959-971. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07205-y. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
4
Clinical impact of heart rate change in patients with acute heart failure in the early phase.急性心力衰竭患者早期心率变化的临床影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;8(4):2982-2990. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13388. Epub 2021 May 2.
5
Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病患者心力衰竭的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD012466. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012466.pub2.
6
Medication dosing for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction - opportunities and challenges.心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者的药物剂量调整——机遇与挑战。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Mar;21(3):286-296. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1351. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
7
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂对心力衰竭患者心血管事件的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Oct 5;17(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0686-z.
8
Korean Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure.《韩国慢性心力衰竭诊断与管理指南》
Korean Circ J. 2017 Sep;47(5):555-643. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0009. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Serum albumin level and hospital mortality in acute non-ischemic heart failure.急性非缺血性心力衰竭患者的血清白蛋白水平与医院死亡率
ESC Heart Fail. 2017 May;4(2):138-145. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12128. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
10
Drug-like actions of autoantibodies against receptors of the autonomous nervous system and their impact on human heart function.自身抗体对自主神经系统受体的类药物作用及其对人体心脏功能的影响。
Br J Pharmacol. 2012 Jun;166(3):847-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01828.x.