• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[对患者的身体约束:与19世纪和20世纪相关的历史记录]

[Physical restraint of patients: historical notes relating to the nineteenth and twentieth century].

作者信息

Fariña-López Emilio, Estévez-Guerra Gabriel J

机构信息

Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.

出版信息

Rev Enferm. 2011 Mar;34(3):22-9.

PMID:21553512
Abstract

Physical restraint has been historically considered a necessary procedure to control the behaviour of the mentally ill. In the late eighteenth century moral treatment would pave the way for new initiatives against restraint, such as those instituted by British psychiatrists. They stressed the importance of training and supervision, as well as a minimum staff ratio, as being determining factors in reducing the use of restraint. This philosophy of treatment, despite its benefits, was introduced later and to a lesser extent in the rest of Europe, although, in other countries care was also made more humane through new therapeutic procedures. By contrast, in the United States most psychiatrists disagreed with those who advocated non-restraint, and continued using controversial methods to control the behaviour of patients. In Spain many difficulties hindered the improvement of conditions in institutions, many of which were in a sorry state. The initiatives of a few professionals and some cautious legal advances tried to alleviate the harshness of the treatment methods used. In the early twentieth century professional manuals were already available, which included the care to be given during the application of physical restraints. However it was not until the 1950, when the emergence of new psychotropic drugs and the distribution of important guidelines on the protection of the rights of patients that the widespread use of this procedure would be successfully reduced.

摘要

身体约束在历史上一直被视为控制精神疾病患者行为的必要手段。18世纪后期,道德治疗为反对约束的新举措铺平了道路,比如英国精神病医生所采取的举措。他们强调培训、监督以及最低员工配比的重要性,认为这些是减少约束使用的决定性因素。这种治疗理念尽管有其益处,但在欧洲其他地区引入得较晚且程度较低,不过在其他国家,通过新的治疗程序,护理也变得更加人道。相比之下,在美国,大多数精神病医生不同意那些主张不使用约束措施的人,并继续使用有争议的方法来控制患者行为。在西班牙,诸多困难阻碍了机构条件的改善,其中许多机构状况不佳。一些专业人士的倡议和一些谨慎的法律进展试图减轻所使用治疗方法的严苛程度。在20世纪初,专业手册就已出现,其中包括在实施身体约束时应给予的护理。然而,直到20世纪50年代,新的精神药物出现以及关于保护患者权利的重要指导方针发布后,这种措施的广泛使用才得以成功减少。

相似文献

1
[Physical restraint of patients: historical notes relating to the nineteenth and twentieth century].[对患者的身体约束:与19世纪和20世纪相关的历史记录]
Rev Enferm. 2011 Mar;34(3):22-9.
2
[Historical aspects of the use of physical restraint: from antiquity to the era of moral treatment].[身体约束使用的历史沿革:从古代到道德治疗时代]
Rev Enferm. 2011 Mar;34(3):14-21.
3
Punishment or therapy. Patients, doctors, and somatic remedies in the early twentieth century.惩罚还是治疗?20世纪初的患者、医生与躯体疗法
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1994 Sep;17(3):493-513.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
[250 years of English psychiatry].[英国精神病学的250年]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1996 Aug;64(8):320-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996401.
6
Self-restraint, self-examination: a historical perspective on restraints and ethics in psychiatry.
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Jun;53(6):663-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.6.663.
7
[The circumstances of using physical restraint in psychiatric services].[精神科服务中使用身体约束的情况]
Psychiatr Pol. 2006 Jul-Aug;40(4):657-69.
8
[The consideration and execution of the principles of no restraint and open door strategies in Hungarian psychiatry].[匈牙利精神病学中无约束和开放门策略原则的考量与实施]
Orvostort Kozl. 1994;40(1-2):29-53.
9
[Good work: "attending to responsibilities" and "greater expections": assessment pattern of attendant behavior and introduction of non-restraint].
Sudhoffs Arch. 2004;88(2):210-25.
10
Seclusion & restraint: a historical perspective.隔离与约束:历史视角
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2005 Feb;43(2):31-7. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20050201-07.