Sir John Walsh Research Institute, School of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Odontology. 2012 Jan;100(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s10266-011-0014-5. Epub 2011 May 10.
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of removing or modifying the smear layer on the indication provided by the Prepometer pulp proximity-indicating instrument. Third molars were prepared to produce flat surfaces in the coronal dentine, and control Prepometer LED readings were made. Group E was treated with 18% EDTA and Group T with Tubulicid. Prepometer readings were repeated. Dentine was removed in 0.5 mm increments, and readings repeated until a red LED appeared, indicating a danger of pulp exposure. Distances to the pulp were measured. t test, Wilcoxon signed ranks test (WSR) and ordinal regression (OR) analysis were performed, together with SEM examination. There were significant differences between both test groups and their untreated controls. OR showed that a red LED appeared further from the pulp with EDTA treatment than with no treatment. A red LED appeared closer to the pulp with Tubulicid treatment than with no treatment. SEM showed smear removal in Group E and occlusion of tubules in Group T. Prepometer performance was significantly influenced by treatment with EDTA and Tubulicid. Practitioners would be required to learn to interpret the display of the Prepometer instrument in the context of the tooth under treatment and the surface condition of the cut dentine.
本研究旨在确定去除或修饰玷污层对 Prepometer 牙髓近邻指示仪提供的指示的影响。将第三磨牙制备成在冠部牙本质上产生平面,然后进行控制 Prepometer LED 读数。E 组用 18%EDTA 处理,T 组用 Tubulicid 处理。重复 Prepometer 读数。以 0.5mm 的增量去除牙本质,并重复读数,直到出现红色 LED,表明有牙髓暴露的危险。测量牙髓的距离。进行 t 检验、Wilcoxon 符号秩检验(WSR)和有序回归(OR)分析,同时进行 SEM 检查。两个实验组与其未处理对照组之间存在显著差异。OR 显示,EDTA 处理后红色 LED 离牙髓更远,而不处理时则更近。Tubulicid 处理后红色 LED 更接近牙髓,而不处理时则更远。SEM 显示 E 组有玷污层去除,T 组有管腔闭塞。EDTA 和 Tubulicid 的处理显著影响了 Prepometer 的性能。临床医生需要学会根据治疗中的牙齿和切割牙本质的表面状况来解释 Prepometer 仪器的显示。