Department of Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2012 Mar;76(2):171-82. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0338-3. Epub 2011 May 10.
Perception and action have long been treated as relatively independent and serial processes. More recent views, however, consider perception and action as relying on a common set of processes and/or representations. The present paper will focus on a variety of specific (content-based) perception-action interactions that have been taken as support for such views. In particular, the following aspects will be considered: direction of influence (perception on action vs. action on perception), temporal type (concurrent vs. non-concurrent), functional relation (related/unrelated), and type of movements (biological vs. non-biological). Different extant models of the perception-action interface are discussed and a classification schema proposed that tries to explain when contrast and when assimilation effects will arise.
感知和行动长期以来一直被视为相对独立和串行的过程。然而,最近的观点认为,感知和行动依赖于共同的过程和/或表示。本文将重点关注各种特定的(基于内容的)感知-行动相互作用,这些相互作用被认为是支持这种观点的证据。具体而言,将考虑以下几个方面:影响方向(感知对行动与行动对感知)、时间类型(并发与非并发)、功能关系(相关与不相关)和运动类型(生物与非生物)。讨论了不同现存的感知-行动界面模型,并提出了一个分类方案,试图解释何时会出现对比效应,何时会出现同化效应。