• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of two antibacterial/anti-inflammatory formulations ('Otomize' spray and 'Otosporin' drops) in the treatment of otitis externa in general practice.

作者信息

Smith R B, Moodie J

机构信息

Medical Department, Pharmakopius (Services) Ltd., Goring-on-Thames, England.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1990;11(10):661-7. doi: 10.1185/03007999009112693.

DOI:10.1185/03007999009112693
PMID:2155756
Abstract

An open, multi-centre study was carried out in general practice to compare the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a neomycin/dexamethasone preparation administered by spray ('Otomize') and neomycin/polymyxin B/hydrocortisone administered as drops ('Otosporin') in the treatment of 187 patients with otitis externa. Patients were allocated at random to receive one or other preparation 3-times daily for 10 days irrespective of response and were followed up again 14 days after cessation of therapy. Assessments were made on entry and at Days 10 and 24 of the severity of erythema, swelling and debris. A global assessment of clinical outcome was made by the doctor on Day 10. There were no significant differences between the two groups at the start of treatment. Significant improvement occurred in both groups from Day 0 to Day 10 and from Day 10 to Day 24 in all symptoms, but no statistically significant differences were recorded between the two drugs. However, significantly more patients in the 'Otomize' group were rated as having a good clinical outcome by the physicians, and a highly significant number of patients, with previous experience of the use of ear drops, expressed a preference for the spray preparation. Few side-effects were reported by either treatment group, none necessitating discontinuation of therapy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of two antibacterial/anti-inflammatory formulations ('Otomize' spray and 'Otosporin' drops) in the treatment of otitis externa in general practice.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1990;11(10):661-7. doi: 10.1185/03007999009112693.
2
A general practice study to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a spray ('Otomize') versus a standard drop formulation ('Sofradex') in the treatment of patients with otitis externa.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1990;12(1):12-8. doi: 10.1185/03007999009111486.
3
Pooled analysis of two clinical trials comparing the clinical outcomes of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone otic suspension and polymyxin B/neomycin/hydrocortisone otic suspension for the treatment of acute otitis externa in adults and children.两项临床试验的汇总分析,比较了环丙沙星/地塞米松耳用混悬液与多粘菌素B/新霉素/氢化可的松耳用混悬液治疗成人和儿童急性外耳道炎的临床疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1950-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.005.
4
A comparison of the treatment of otitis externa with 'Otosporin' and aluminium acetate: a report from a services practice in Cyprus.“耳孢素”与醋酸铝治疗外耳道炎的比较:塞浦路斯一项服务实践的报告
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 May;31(226):291-4.
5
A double-blind comparative study of Otoseptil Ear Drops and Otosporin Ear Drops in otitis externa.Otoseptil滴耳液与Otosporin滴耳液治疗外耳道炎的双盲对照研究
J Int Med Res. 1976;4(1):79-81. doi: 10.1177/030006057600400113.
6
Once-daily ofloxacin otic solution versus neomycin sulfate/polymyxin B sulfate/hydrocortisone otic suspension four times a day: a multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded trial to compare the efficacy, safety, and pain relief in pediatric patients with otitis externa.每日一次的氧氟沙星耳用溶液与每日四次的硫酸新霉素/硫酸多粘菌素B/氢化可的松耳用混悬液对比:一项多中心、随机、评估者盲法试验,比较小儿外耳道炎患者的疗效、安全性及疼痛缓解情况。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1725-36. doi: 10.1185/030079906X121057.
7
Differences in bacteriologic treatment failures in acute otitis externa between ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone and neomycin/polymyxin B/hydrocortisone: results of a combined analysis.环丙沙星/地塞米松与新霉素/多粘菌素B/氢化可的松治疗急性外耳道炎细菌学治疗失败的差异:一项联合分析的结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Feb;25(2):287-91. doi: 10.1185/03007990802603072.
8
Endoscopic photographic comparison of drug delivery by ear-drops and by aerosol spray.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992 Aug;17(4):359-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1992.tb01013.x.
9
Declining susceptibility to neomycin and polymyxin B of pathogens recovered in otitis externa clinical trials.外耳道炎临床试验中分离出的病原体对新霉素和多粘菌素B的敏感性下降。
South Med J. 2004 May;97(5):465-71. doi: 10.1097/00007611-200405000-00010.
10
The effectiveness of topical treatment in discharging ears with in-dwelling ventilation tubes.
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2000;121(1):27-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Topical application of Otosporin® before in-office bleaching: a split mouth, triple-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial.Otosporin® 于诊室美白治疗前的局部应用:一项分口、三盲、多中心随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2555-2564. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04224-9. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
2
Optimum management of the discharging ear.耳部流脓的最佳处理方法。
Drugs. 1992 Feb;43(2):219-35. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199243020-00008.