Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York 10010, USA.
J Dent. 2011 Jul;39(7):489-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
To compare fatigue failure modes and reliability of hand-veneered and over-pressed implant-supported three-unit zirconium-oxide fixed-dental-prostheses(FDPs).
Sixty-four custom-made zirconium-oxide abutments (n=32/group) and thirty-two zirconium-oxide FDP-frameworks were CAD/CAM manufactured. Frameworks were veneered with hand-built up or over-pressed porcelain (n=16/group). Step-stress-accelerated-life-testing (SSALT) was performed in water applying a distributed contact load at the buccal cusp-pontic-area. Post failure examinations were carried out using optical (polarized-reflected-light) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to visualize crack propagation and failure modes. Reliability was compared using cumulative-damage step-stress analysis (Alta-7-Pro, Reliasoft).
Crack propagation was observed in the veneering porcelain during fatigue. The majority of zirconium-oxide FDPs demonstrated porcelain chipping as the dominant failure mode. Nevertheless, fracture of the zirconium-oxide frameworks was also observed. Over-pressed FDPs failed earlier at a mean failure load of 696 ± 149N relative to hand-veneered at 882 ± 61N (profile I). Weibull-stress-number of cycles-unreliability-curves were generated. The reliability (2-sided at 90% confidence bounds) for a 400N load at 100K cycles indicated values of 0.84 (0.98-0.24) for the hand-veneered FDPs and 0.50 (0.82-0.09) for their over-pressed counterparts.
Both zirconium-oxide FDP systems were resistant under accelerated-life-time-testing. Over-pressed specimens were more susceptible to fatigue loading with earlier veneer chipping.
比较手工堆瓷和超压两种方式的牙种植体支持的三单位氧化锆固定修复体(FDP)的疲劳失效模式和可靠性。
制作 64 个定制氧化锆基台(n=32/组)和 32 个氧化锆 FDP 支架,采用 CAD/CAM 制造。支架用手工堆积瓷或超压瓷贴面(n=16/组)。在水介质中进行阶跃加速寿命试验(SSALT),施加颊尖-桥体区域的分布式接触载荷。失效后采用光学(偏光反射光)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查,以观察裂纹扩展和失效模式。采用累积损伤阶跃应力分析(Alta-7-Pro,Reliasoft)比较可靠性。
疲劳过程中观察到贴面瓷中的裂纹扩展。大多数氧化锆 FDP 的主要失效模式为瓷层崩瓷。然而,也观察到氧化锆支架断裂。超压 FDP 的平均失效负荷为 696±149N,早于手工堆瓷的 882±61N(剖面 I)。生成了威布尔应力-循环-失效率曲线。在 400N 负荷和 100K 循环的双侧 90%置信区间下,2 种 FDP 的可靠性值分别为 0.84(0.98-0.24)和 0.50(0.82-0.09)。
两种氧化锆 FDP 系统在加速寿命试验中均具有抗疲劳性能。超压样本更容易受到疲劳载荷的影响,导致贴面瓷层更早崩瓷。