Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Epidemiology. 2011 Sep;22(5):713-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31821db503.
The paper relates estimation and testing for additive interaction in proportional hazards models to causal interactions within the counterfactual framework. A definition of a causal interaction for time-to-event outcomes is given that generalizes existing definitions for dichotomous outcomes. Conditions are given concerning the relative excess risk due to interaction in proportional hazards models that imply the presence of a causal interaction at some point in time. Further results are given that allow for assessing the range of times and baseline survival probabilities for which parameter estimates indicate that a causal interaction is present, and for deriving lower bounds on the prevalence of such causal interactions. An interesting feature of the time-to-event setting is that causal interactions can disappear as time progresses, ie, whether a causal interaction is present depends on the follow-up time. The results are illustrated by hypothetical and data analysis examples.
本文将比例风险模型中的加性交互作用的估计和检验与反事实框架内的因果交互作用联系起来。给出了适用于事件时间结果的因果交互作用的定义,该定义扩展了现有用于二项结果的定义。给出了在比例风险模型中由于交互作用而导致的相对超额风险的条件,这些条件意味着在某个时间点存在因果交互作用。进一步的结果允许评估参数估计表明存在因果交互作用的时间范围和基线生存概率,并推导出此类因果交互作用的普遍性的下限。事件时间设置的一个有趣特征是,因果交互作用随着时间的推移而消失,即因果交互作用是否存在取决于随访时间。通过假设和数据分析示例来说明结果。