• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估计暴露因素对事件发生时间结局的因果效应时使用靶向最大似然法和机器学习的指南与最佳实践

Guidelines and Best Practices for the Use of Targeted Maximum Likelihood and Machine Learning When Estimating Causal Effects of Exposures on Time-To-Event Outcomes.

作者信息

Talbot Denis, Diop Awa, Mésidor Miceline, Chiu Yohann, Sirois Caroline, Spieker Andrew J, Pariente Antoine, Noize Pernelle, Simard Marc, Luque Fernandez Miguel Angel, Schomaker Michael, Fujita Kenji, Gnjidic Danijela, Schnitzer Mireille E

机构信息

Département de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

Axe Santé des Populations et Pratiques Optimales en Santé, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2025 Mar 15;44(6):e70034. doi: 10.1002/sim.70034.

DOI:10.1002/sim.70034
PMID:40079648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11905698/
Abstract

Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) is an increasingly popular framework for the estimation of causal effects. It requires modeling both the exposure and outcome but is doubly robust in the sense that it is valid if at least one of these models is correctly specified. In addition, TMLE allows for flexible modeling of both the exposure and outcome with machine learning methods. This provides better control for measured confounders since the model specification automatically adapts to the data, instead of needing to be specified by the analyst a priori. Despite these methodological advantages, TMLE remains less popular than alternatives in part because of its less accessible theory and implementation. While some tutorials have been proposed, none address the case of a time-to-event outcome. This tutorial provides a detailed step-by-step explanation of the implementation of TMLE for estimating the effect of a point binary or multilevel exposure on a time-to-event outcome, modeled as counterfactual survival curves and causal hazard ratios. The tutorial also provides guidelines on how best to use TMLE in practice, including aspects related to study design, choice of covariates, controlling biases and use of machine learning. R-code is provided to illustrate each step using simulated data ( https://github.com/detal9/SurvTMLE). To facilitate implementation, a general R function implementing TMLE with options to use machine learning is also provided. The method is illustrated in a real-data analysis concerning the effectiveness of statins for the prevention of a first cardiovascular disease among older adults in Québec, Canada, between 2013 and 2018.

摘要

靶向最大似然估计(TMLE)是一种越来越流行的用于估计因果效应的框架。它需要对暴露因素和结局进行建模,但具有双重稳健性,即如果这些模型中至少有一个被正确设定,那么它就是有效的。此外,TMLE允许使用机器学习方法对暴露因素和结局进行灵活建模。由于模型设定会自动适应数据,而无需分析师事先指定,这就为测量的混杂因素提供了更好的控制。尽管有这些方法上的优势,但TMLE的受欢迎程度仍低于其他方法,部分原因是其理论和实现方法较难理解。虽然已经提出了一些教程,但没有一个涉及到事件发生时间结局的情况。本教程详细逐步解释了TMLE的实现过程,用于估计点二元或多级暴露因素对事件发生时间结局的影响,将其建模为反事实生存曲线和因果风险比。本教程还提供了在实际应用中如何最好地使用TMLE的指南,包括与研究设计、协变量选择、控制偏差以及机器学习使用相关的方面。提供了R代码以使用模拟数据说明每个步骤(https://github.com/detal9/SurvTMLE)。为便于实现,还提供了一个通用的R函数,该函数实现了带有使用机器学习选项的TMLE。在一项关于2013年至2018年加拿大魁北克省老年人中他汀类药物预防首次心血管疾病有效性的真实数据分析中展示了该方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdf/11905698/7fe44e8ee054/SIM-44-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdf/11905698/35e32164d162/SIM-44-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdf/11905698/7fe44e8ee054/SIM-44-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdf/11905698/35e32164d162/SIM-44-0-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdf/11905698/7fe44e8ee054/SIM-44-0-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Guidelines and Best Practices for the Use of Targeted Maximum Likelihood and Machine Learning When Estimating Causal Effects of Exposures on Time-To-Event Outcomes.估计暴露因素对事件发生时间结局的因果效应时使用靶向最大似然法和机器学习的指南与最佳实践
Stat Med. 2025 Mar 15;44(6):e70034. doi: 10.1002/sim.70034.
2
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for a binary treatment: A tutorial.针对二项治疗的目标极大似然估计:教程。
Stat Med. 2018 Jul 20;37(16):2530-2546. doi: 10.1002/sim.7628. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
3
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.观察性研究中因果推断的靶向最大似然估计
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 1;185(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww165. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
4
Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.二元结局和高维协变量数据的点暴露研究中的效应估计——靶向最大似然估计与治疗权重逆概率的比较
Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2). doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0034.
5
Application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation in public health and epidemiological studies: a systematic review.靶向极大似然估计在公共卫生和流行病学研究中的应用:系统评价。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;86:34-48.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
6
Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.协作双稳健靶向最大似然估计
Int J Biostat. 2010 May 17;6(1):Article 17. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1181.
7
Towards Robust Causal Inference in Epidemiological Research: Employing Double Cross-fit TMLE in Right Heart Catheterization Data.迈向流行病学研究中的稳健因果推断:在右心导管插入术数据中应用双重交叉拟合全最大似然估计法
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 10. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae447.
8
Machine learning in causal inference for epidemiology.流行病学中的因果推理中的机器学习。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;39(10):1097-1108. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01173-x. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
9
Handling missing data when estimating causal effects with targeted maximum likelihood estimation. 采用有向极大似然估计法估计因果效应时处理缺失数据。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jul 8;193(7):1019-1030. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae012.
10
Marginal Structural Models with Counterfactual Effect Modifiers.具有反事实效应修饰因子的边际结构模型。
Int J Biostat. 2018 Jun 8;14(1):/j/ijb.2018.14.issue-1/ijb-2018-0039/ijb-2018-0039.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2018-0039.

引用本文的文献

1
Causal estimation of time-varying treatments in observational studies: a scoping review of methods, applications, and missing data practices.观察性研究中时变治疗的因果估计:方法、应用及缺失数据处理的范围综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02633-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Causal Inference for Continuous Multiple Time Point Interventions.连续多点干预的因果推断。
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 10;43(28):5380-5400. doi: 10.1002/sim.10246. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
2
Application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation in public health and epidemiological studies: a systematic review.靶向极大似然估计在公共卫生和流行病学研究中的应用:系统评价。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;86:34-48.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
3
Estimation of time-specific intervention effects on continuously distributed time-to-event outcomes by targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
通过有针对性的极大似然估计估计连续分布的时间事件结局的时间特异性干预效果。
Biometrics. 2023 Dec;79(4):3038-3049. doi: 10.1111/biom.13856. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
4
Practical considerations for specifying a super learner.指定超级学习者的实用考虑因素。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug 2;52(4):1276-1285. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad023.
5
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for causal inference in survival and competing risks analysis.生存和竞争风险分析中因果推断的靶向极大似然估计。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2024 Jan;30(1):4-33. doi: 10.1007/s10985-022-09576-2. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
6
Confounding adjustment methods for multi-level treatment comparisons under lack of positivity and unknown model specification.缺乏正性假设和模型规范未知情况下多水平治疗比较的混杂因素调整方法。
J Appl Stat. 2021 Apr 7;49(10):2570-2592. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1911966. eCollection 2022.
7
Causal inference in case of near-violation of positivity: comparison of methods.在接近违反正性假设情况下的因果推断:方法比较
Biom J. 2022 Dec;64(8):1389-1403. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000323. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
G-computation and doubly robust standardisation for continuous-time data: A comparison with inverse probability weighting.连续时间数据的G计算和双重稳健标准化:与逆概率加权法的比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Apr;31(4):706-718. doi: 10.1177/09622802211047345. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
9
Introduction to computational causal inference using reproducible Stata, R, and Python code: A tutorial.使用可重现的Stata、R和Python代码进行计算因果推断入门教程
Stat Med. 2022 Jan 30;41(2):407-432. doi: 10.1002/sim.9234. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs.有向无环图教程。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:264-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 8.