Suppr超能文献

治疗依从性和持续性与度洛西汀、文拉法辛 XR 和艾司西酞普兰在主要抑郁障碍和慢性疼痛相关疾病患者中。

Treatment adherence and persistence with duloxetine, venlafaxine XR, and escitalopram among patients with major depressive disorder and chronic pain-related diseases.

机构信息

University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jul;27(7):1303-13. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.576663. Epub 2011 May 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chronic pain is prevalent in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study compared adherence and persistence rates among MDD patients with comorbid chronic pain-related diseases (CPD, including fibromyalgia, diabetes with neurological manifestations, osteoarthritis, low back pain, and headache) for three antidepressants: duloxetine, venlafaxine XR, and escitalopram.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 15,523 adult MDD patients with CPD in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database who started on one of the study medications between 07/01/06 and 06/30/07. Patients were followed-up for 6 months. Adherence was reported using a medication possession ratio ≥0.8. Persistence was measured using persistence rates (proportions of patients who continuously refilled prescriptions during 6 months) and duration of therapy (number of days patients remained on the study medication before a prescription gap over 30 days). Multivariate logistic regression on adherence and persistence rates and linear regression on duration of therapy adjusting for patient and prescription characteristics were conducted.

RESULTS

Patients on duloxetine had a higher adherence rate (46.03%) than those on venlafaxine XR (42.94%; p = 0.0033) or escitalopram (37.27%; p < 0.0001). Patients on duloxetine also had a higher persistence rate and longer duration of therapy (43.66%, 117.82 days) than did patients treated with venlafaxine XR (40.38%; p = 0.0017; 114.24 days; p = 0.009) or escitalopram (33.86%; p < 0.0001; 105.73 days; p < 0.0001). These differences were still significant after adjusting for patient and prescription characteristics (p < 0.05). Sensitivity analyses found similar patterns using an allowable gap for refill of 15 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Among commercially insured MDD patients with CPD, duloxetine-treated patients had higher adherence and persistence rates than did patients treated with venlafaxine XR or escitalopram during 6 months after medication initiation. Future studies should examine the clinical and economic implications of these differences.

LIMITATIONS

This study has limitations such as possible selection bias using secondary database analysis.

摘要

目的

患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者常伴有慢性疼痛。本研究比较了伴有慢性疼痛相关疾病(CPD,包括纤维肌痛、有神经表现的糖尿病、骨关节炎、腰痛和头痛)的 MDD 患者使用三种抗抑郁药(度洛西汀、文拉法辛 XR 和依西酞普兰)的依从性和持续性。

研究设计和方法

本研究对 2006 年 7 月 1 日至 2007 年 6 月 30 日期间在 MarketScan 商业索赔和就诊数据库中使用研究药物之一开始治疗的 15523 名伴有 CPD 的成年 MDD 患者进行了回顾性分析。患者接受了 6 个月的随访。使用药物维持率(≥0.8 的药物占有比)来报告依从性。通过持续处方率(6 个月内持续处方的患者比例)和治疗持续时间(患者在处方间隔超过 30 天之前使用研究药物的天数)来衡量持续性。根据患者和处方特征,对依从性和持续性率进行多变量逻辑回归,对治疗持续时间进行线性回归。

结果

与文拉法辛 XR(42.94%;p=0.0033)或依西酞普兰(37.27%;p<0.0001)相比,使用度洛西汀的患者具有更高的依从率(46.03%)。使用度洛西汀的患者也具有更高的持续性率和更长的治疗持续时间(43.66%,117.82 天),与使用文拉法辛 XR(40.38%;p=0.0017;114.24 天;p=0.009)或依西酞普兰(33.86%;p<0.0001;105.73 天;p<0.0001)的患者相比。在调整了患者和处方特征后,这些差异仍然具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。敏感性分析发现,在允许 15 天的补充间隔的情况下,也存在类似的模式。

结论

在伴有 CPD 的商业保险 MDD 患者中,与使用文拉法辛 XR 或依西酞普兰的患者相比,使用度洛西汀的患者在开始用药后 6 个月内具有更高的依从性和持续性。未来的研究应检查这些差异的临床和经济意义。

局限性

本研究存在一些局限性,如使用二次数据库分析可能存在选择偏倚。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验