Suppr超能文献

美国毒物释放清单中的有毒化学物质和工业部门的优先筛选:美国环保局开发的基于生命周期影响的和基于风险的评估工具的比较。

Priority screening of toxic chemicals and industry sectors in the U.S. toxics release inventory: a comparison of the life cycle impact-based and risk-based assessment tools developed by U.S. EPA.

机构信息

Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2011 Sep;92(9):2235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 May 10.

Abstract

Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) and Risk Assessment (RA) employ different approaches to evaluate toxic impact potential for their own general applications. LCIA is often used to evaluate toxicity potentials for corporate environmental management and RA is often used to evaluate a risk score for environmental policy in government. This study evaluates the cancer, non-cancer, and ecotoxicity potentials and risk scores of chemicals and industry sectors in the United States on the basis of the LCIA- and RA-based tools developed by U.S. EPA, and compares the priority screening of toxic chemicals and industry sectors identified with each method to examine whether the LCIA- and RA-based results lead to the same prioritization schemes. The Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and other environmental Impacts (TRACI) is applied as an LCIA-based screening approach with a focus on air and water emissions, and the Risk-Screening Environmental Indicator (RSEI) is applied in equivalent fashion as an RA-based screening approach. The U.S. Toxic Release Inventory is used as the dataset for this analysis, because of its general applicability to a comprehensive list of chemical substances and industry sectors. Overall, the TRACI and RSEI results do not agree with each other in part due to the unavailability of characterization factors and toxic scores for select substances, but primarily because of their different evaluation approaches. Therefore, TRACI and RSEI should be used together both to support a more comprehensive and robust approach to screening of chemicals for environmental management and policy and to highlight substances that are found to be of concern from both perspectives.

摘要

生命周期影响评估(LCIA)和风险评估(RA)采用不同的方法来评估其自身的一般应用的毒性影响潜力。LCIA 常用于企业环境管理中的毒性潜力评估,RA 常用于政府环境政策中的风险评分评估。本研究基于美国环保署开发的基于 LCIA 和 RA 的工具,评估了美国化学品和工业部门的癌症、非癌症和生态毒性潜力和风险评分,并比较了每种方法确定的有毒化学品和工业部门的优先筛选,以检验基于 LCIA 和 RA 的结果是否导致相同的优先级排序方案。工具用于减少和评估化学品和其他环境影响(TRACI)作为基于 LCIA 的筛选方法,重点关注空气和水排放,风险筛选环境指标(RSEI)以相同的方式作为基于 RA 的筛选方法。由于其对广泛的化学物质和工业部门的普遍适用性,本分析使用了美国有毒物质释放清单作为数据集。总体而言,TRACI 和 RSEI 的结果并不一致,部分原因是某些物质的特征化因子和毒性分数不可用,但主要是因为它们的评估方法不同。因此,TRACI 和 RSEI 应该一起使用,以支持对化学品进行更全面和稳健的环境管理和政策筛选,并突出从两个角度都被认为是关注的物质。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验