• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于 24 小时回顾法中对食物份量的估计不准确,导致不同食物组的摄入量存在不确定性。

Uncertainty in intake due to portion size estimation in 24-hour recalls varies between food groups.

机构信息

Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Nutr. 2011 Jul;141(7):1396-401. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.139220. Epub 2011 May 11.

DOI:10.3945/jn.111.139220
PMID:21562232
Abstract

Portion size estimation is expected to be one of the largest sources of uncertainty in dietary assessment of the individual. Therefore, we demonstrated a method to quantify uncertainty due to portion size estimation in the usual intake distributions of vegetables, fruit, bread, protein, and potassium. Dutch participants of the European Food Consumption Validation study completed 2 nonconsecutive 24-h recall interviews. In short, the uncertainty analysis consists of Monte Carlo simulations drawing values for portion size from lognormal uncertainty distributions. The uncertainty of the usual intake distribution and accompanying parameters (IQR and the shrinkage factor) were estimated. For the food groups, portion size uncertainty had the greatest effect for vegetables and the least for fruit: the relative 95% uncertainty interval (UI) of the IQR of the usual intake distribution was 0.61-1.35 for vegetables, 0.77-1.24 for bread, and 0.99-1.10 for fruit. For protein and potassium, the resulting relative width of the UI of the IQR for portion size uncertainty are similar: 0.88-1.14 for protein and 0.86-1.14 for potassium. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis illustrated the importance of the specified uncertainty distributions. The examples show that uncertainty in portion sizes may be more important for some foods such as vegetables. This may reflect differential quantification errors by food groups that deserve further consideration. In conclusion, the presented methodology allows the important quantification of portion size uncertainty and extensions to include other sources of uncertainty is straightforward.

摘要

食物份量估计预计是个体膳食评估中不确定性最大的来源之一。因此,我们展示了一种方法,用于量化蔬菜、水果、面包、蛋白质和钾的日常摄入量分布中由于份量估计而产生的不确定性。荷兰欧洲食品消费验证研究的参与者完成了 2 次非连续的 24 小时回顾性采访。简而言之,不确定性分析包括从对数正态不确定性分布中抽取份量值的蒙特卡罗模拟。估计了日常摄入量分布的不确定性和伴随参数(IQR 和收缩因子)。对于食物组,份量不确定性对蔬菜的影响最大,对水果的影响最小:日常摄入量分布 IQR 的相对 95%不确定性区间(UI)为蔬菜 0.61-1.35,面包 0.77-1.24,水果 0.99-1.10。对于蛋白质和钾,部分大小不确定性导致的 IQR UI 相对宽度相似:蛋白质为 0.88-1.14,钾为 0.86-1.14。此外,敏感性分析说明了指定不确定性分布的重要性。这些例子表明,不确定性在某些食物(如蔬菜)中可能更为重要。这可能反映了不同食物组的定量误差值得进一步考虑。总之,所提出的方法允许对份量不确定性进行重要的量化,并且可以轻松扩展到包括其他来源的不确定性。

相似文献

1
Uncertainty in intake due to portion size estimation in 24-hour recalls varies between food groups.由于 24 小时回顾法中对食物份量的估计不准确,导致不同食物组的摄入量存在不确定性。
J Nutr. 2011 Jul;141(7):1396-401. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.139220. Epub 2011 May 11.
2
Adjustment Factors Can Improve Estimates of Food Group Intake Assessed Using a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument.调整因素可以改善使用短期饮食评估工具评估的食物组摄入量的估计。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Oct;118(10):1864-1873. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 May 1.
3
Development and validation of a food photography manual, as a tool for estimation of food portion size in epidemiological dietary surveys in Tunisia.食品摄影手册的编制与验证:作为突尼斯流行病学饮食调查中估计食物份量的工具
Libyan J Med. 2016 Aug 31;11:32676. doi: 10.3402/ljm.v11.32676. eCollection 2016.
4
Comparing four methods to estimate usual intake distributions.比较四种方法估计常用摄入量分布。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Jul;65 Suppl 1:S92-101. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.93.
5
The European Food Consumption Validation Project: conclusions and recommendations.欧洲食品消费验证项目:结论和建议。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Jul;65 Suppl 1:S102-7. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.94.
6
The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls.与传统的访员管理式回忆法相比,在24小时回忆法中使用数字图像可能会减少对食物分量的误判。
J Nutr. 2016 Dec;146(12):2567-2573. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.237271. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Portion Sizes from 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Differed by Sex among Those Who Selected the Same Portion Size Category on a Food Frequency Questionnaire.在食物频率问卷中选择相同份量类别者,其 24 小时膳食回顾的份量大小因性别而异。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1711-1718. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 May 8.
8
The Accuracy of Portion Size Reporting on Self-Administered Online 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Among Women With Low Incomes.低收入女性自行在线报告 24 小时膳食回忆中份量大小的准确性。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Dec;122(12):2243-2256. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
9
Progressive 24-Hour Recall: Usability Study of Short Retention Intervals in Web-Based Dietary Assessment Surveys.渐进式24小时回忆法:基于网络的饮食评估调查中短保留间隔的可用性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 3;22(2):e13266. doi: 10.2196/13266.
10
The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups.荷兰EPIC食物频率问卷。I. 问卷描述以及食物组别的相对效度和可重复性。
Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26 Suppl 1:S37-48. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.suppl_1.s37.

引用本文的文献

1
Interviewer Error Within the Face-to-Face Food Frequency Questionnaire in Large Multisite Epidemiologic Studies.面对面食物频率问卷在大型多中心流行病学研究中的访谈者误差。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;191(5):921-929. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac024.
2
Complementary feeding practices and nutrient intakes of children aged 6-24 months from Bangladeshi background living in Tower Hamlets, East London: a feasibility study.孟加拉裔背景儿童在东伦敦塔哈姆雷特(Tower Hamlets)6-24 月龄的补充喂养实践和营养摄入:一项可行性研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2020 Feb 28;39(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41043-020-0213-1.
3
Optimizing portion-size estimation aids: a formative evaluation in Malawi.
优化份量估计辅助工具:马拉维的形成性评价。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(17):3127-3139. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001733. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Subjects' Perception in Quantifying Printed and Digital Photos of Food Portions.被试者对食物分量的打印照片和数字照片的量化感知。
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 27;11(3):501. doi: 10.3390/nu11030501.
5
Effects of selenium supplementation on paraoxonase-1 and myeloperoxidase activity in subjects with cardiovascular disease: the Selenegene study, a double-blind randomized controlled trial.补充硒对心血管疾病患者对氧磷酶-1和髓过氧化物酶活性的影响:硒基因研究,一项双盲随机对照试验。
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2018 Aug 24;3:e112-e118. doi: 10.5114/amsad.2018.77820. eCollection 2018.
6
A Potential Tool for Clinicians; Evaluating a Computer-Led Dietary Assessment Method in Overweight and Obese Women during Weight Loss.临床医生的潜在工具;评估计算机主导的饮食评估方法在超重和肥胖女性减肥期间的应用
Nutrients. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):218. doi: 10.3390/nu9030218.
7
Major dietary patterns in Iranian adolescents: Isfahan Healthy Heart Program, Iran.伊朗青少年的主要饮食模式:伊朗伊斯法罕健康心脏项目
ARYA Atheroscler. 2015 Feb;11(Suppl 1):61-8.
8
The nutrition consult for recurrent stone formers.复发性结石形成者的营养咨询。
Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Jul;16(7):47. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0518-6.
9
Comparison of two dietary assessment methods by food consumption: results of the German National Nutrition Survey II.通过食物摄入量对两种膳食评估方法的比较:德国第二次全国营养调查结果
Eur J Nutr. 2015 Apr;54(3):343-54. doi: 10.1007/s00394-014-0714-z. Epub 2014 May 15.