Suppr超能文献

微波消融猪肾的体内研究:两种不同消融模式(“温度控制”和“功率控制”)对操作结果的影响。

Microwave ablation of porcine kidneys in vivo: effect of two different ablation modes ("temperature control" and "power control") on procedural outcome.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;35(3):653-60. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0171-5. Epub 2011 May 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was designed to analyze the effect of two different ablation modes ("temperature control" and "power control") of a microwave system on procedural outcome in porcine kidneys in vivo.

METHODS

A commercially available microwave system (Avecure Microwave Generator; MedWaves, San Diego, CA) was used. The system offers the possibility to ablate with two different ablation modes: temperature control and power control. Thirty-two microwave ablations were performed in 16 kidneys of 8 pigs. In each animal, one kidney was ablated twice by applying temperature control (ablation duration set point at 60 s, ablation temperature set point at 96°C, automatic power set point; group I). The other kidney was ablated twice by applying power control (ablation duration set point at 60 s, ablation temperature set point at 96°C, ablation power set point at 24 W; group II). Procedural outcome was analyzed: (1) technical success (e.g., system failures, duration of the ablation cycle), and (2) ablation geometry (e.g., long axis diameter, short axis diameter, and circularity).

RESULTS

System failures occurred in 0% in group I and 13% in group II. Duration of the ablation cycle was 60±0 s in group I and 102±21 s in group II. Long axis diameter was 20.3±4.6 mm in group I and 19.8±3.5 mm in group II (not significant (NS)). Short axis diameter was 10.3±2 mm in group I and 10.5±2.4 mm in group II (NS). Circularity was 0.5±0.1 in group I and 0.5±0.1 in group II (NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Microwave ablations performed with temperature control showed fewer system failures and were finished faster. Both ablation modes demonstrated no significant differences with respect to ablation geometry.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析微波系统的两种不同消融模式(“温度控制”和“功率控制”)对猪肾体内手术结果的影响。

方法

使用一种市售的微波系统(Avecure 微波发生器;MedWaves,圣地亚哥,CA)。该系统提供了两种不同消融模式的可能性:温度控制和功率控制。在 8 头猪的 32 个肾脏中进行了 32 次微波消融。在每只动物中,一只肾脏通过应用温度控制进行两次消融(消融持续时间设定点为 60 秒,消融温度设定点为 96°C,自动功率设定点;I 组)。另一只肾脏通过应用功率控制进行两次消融(消融持续时间设定点为 60 秒,消融温度设定点为 96°C,消融功率设定点为 24 W;II 组)。分析手术结果:(1)技术成功(例如系统故障、消融周期持续时间),以及(2)消融几何形状(例如长轴直径、短轴直径和圆度)。

结果

I 组系统故障发生率为 0%,II 组为 13%。I 组消融周期持续时间为 60±0 秒,II 组为 102±21 秒。I 组的长轴直径为 20.3±4.6 毫米,II 组为 19.8±3.5 毫米(无显著差异(NS))。I 组的短轴直径为 10.3±2 毫米,II 组为 10.5±2.4 毫米(NS)。I 组的圆度为 0.5±0.1,II 组为 0.5±0.1(NS)。

结论

温度控制下的微波消融系统故障较少,完成速度较快。两种消融模式在消融几何形状方面无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验