Hope William W, Schmelzer Thomas M, Newcomb William L, Heath Jessica J, Lincourt Amy E, Norton H James, Heniford B Todd, Iannitti David A
Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, USA.
J Surg Res. 2009 May 15;153(2):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.03.044. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
Microwave technology provides an emerging thermal ablation technique for solid organ tumors. We propose guidelines and recommend optimal time and power for use.
Microwave ablations using a VivaWave Microwave Ablation System (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) were performed in vivo in a porcine kidney model. The independent variables were power (20, 30, 40, 45, 50, 60 W) and time (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20 min) with the outcome variable diameter of ablation. Following ablations, kidneys were procured for gross and histological evaluation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used followed by Tukey tests when appropriate. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In 308 total ablations, a minimum of 7 ablations were performed in 35 of 42 power and time variables (83%). The outcome variable, ablation diameter, was affected significantly by time, power, and time/power interaction (P < 0.0001). For each time point, a one-way ANOVA showed an overall significant difference in ablation size X wattage (P < 0.0001). Tukey tests showed that, at each time point, ablation sizes at 45, 50, and 60 W were not significantly different. After determining that 45 W was optimal, a one-way ANOVA showed an overall significant difference in ablation sizes for time points at 45 W (P < 0.0001). Tukey tests showed that, at 45 W, ablation sizes at 10 min were significantly larger than ablation sizes at 8, 6, 4, and 2 min.
We propose guidelines for use of a novel microwave ablation system and recommend use at 45 W for 10 min.
微波技术为实体器官肿瘤提供了一种新兴的热消融技术。我们提出了指导方针并推荐了最佳使用时间和功率。
使用VivaWave微波消融系统(Valleylab,博尔德,科罗拉多州)在猪肾模型中进行体内微波消融。自变量为功率(20、30、40、45、50、60瓦)和时间(2、4、6、8、10、15、20分钟),结果变量为消融直径。消融后,获取肾脏进行大体和组织学评估。使用方差分析(ANOVA),并在适当情况下进行Tukey检验。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
在总共308次消融中,42个功率和时间变量中的35个(83%)至少进行了7次消融。结果变量,即消融直径,受时间、功率和时间/功率相互作用的显著影响(P<0.0001)。对于每个时间点,单向方差分析显示消融大小X瓦数存在总体显著差异(P<0.0001)。Tukey检验表明,在每个时间点,45、50和60瓦时的消融大小无显著差异。确定45瓦为最佳功率后,单向方差分析显示45瓦时各时间点的消融大小存在总体显著差异(P<0.0001)。Tukey检验表明,在45瓦时,10分钟时的消融大小显著大于8、6、4和2分钟时的消融大小。
我们提出了一种新型微波消融系统的使用指导方针,并推荐在45瓦下使用10分钟。