• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

走过门口会导致遗忘:进一步探索。

Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Further explorations.

作者信息

Radvansky Gabriel A, Krawietz Sabine A, Tamplin Andrea K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Aug;64(8):1632-45. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.571267. Epub 2011 May 24.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2011.571267
PMID:21563019
Abstract

Previous research using virtual environments has revealed a location-updating effect in which there is a decline in memory when people move from one location to another. Here we assess whether this effect reflects the influence of the experienced context, in terms of the degree of immersion of a person in an environment, as suggested by some work in spatial cognition, or by a shift in context. In Experiment 1, the degree of immersion was reduced by using smaller displays. In comparison, in Experiment 2 an actual, rather than a virtual, environment was used, to maximize immersion. Location-updating effects were observed under both of these conditions. In Experiment 3, the original encoding context was reinstated by having a person return to the original room in which objects were first encoded. However, inconsistent with an encoding specificity account, memory did not improve by reinstating this context. Finally, we did a further analysis of the results of this and previous experiments to assess the differential influence of foregrounding and retrieval interference. Overall, these data are interpreted in terms of the event horizon model of event cognition and memory.

摘要

以往使用虚拟环境的研究揭示了一种位置更新效应,即当人们从一个位置移动到另一个位置时,记忆力会下降。在这里,我们评估这种效应是否反映了经验背景的影响,这是根据空间认知方面的一些研究提出的,即一个人在环境中的沉浸程度,或者是背景的转变。在实验1中,通过使用较小的显示屏来降低沉浸程度。相比之下,在实验2中使用了真实而非虚拟的环境,以最大化沉浸感。在这两种条件下均观察到了位置更新效应。在实验3中,通过让一个人回到最初对物体进行编码的房间来恢复原始的编码背景。然而,与编码特异性理论不符的是,恢复这个背景并没有提高记忆力。最后,我们对本次实验和以往实验的结果进行了进一步分析,以评估突出显示和检索干扰的不同影响。总体而言,这些数据是根据事件认知和记忆的事件视界模型来解释的。

相似文献

1
Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Further explorations.走过门口会导致遗忘:进一步探索。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Aug;64(8):1632-45. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.571267. Epub 2011 May 24.
2
Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Event structure or updating disruption?穿过门口会导致遗忘:是事件结构还是更新干扰?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Nov;69(11):2119-29. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1101478. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
Walking through doorways causes forgetting: recall.走过门口会导致遗忘:回忆。
Memory. 2018 Nov;26(10):1430-1435. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1489555. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
4
Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments.学习环境和新环境中的感觉运动对齐效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov;33(6):1092-107. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1092.
5
Walking through doorways causes forgetting: situation models and experienced space.穿过门口会导致遗忘:情境模型与体验空间。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1150-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03193261.
6
Where do you think you are? Effects of conceptual current position on spatial memory performance.你以为你在哪里?概念性当前位置对空间记忆表现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 May;36(3):686-98. doi: 10.1037/a0018713.
7
High-resolution ERP mapping of cortical activation related to implicit object-location memory.与内隐物体位置记忆相关的皮层激活的高分辨率事件相关电位图谱
Biol Psychol. 2009 Dec;82(3):234-45. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
8
Mentally walking through doorways causes forgetting: The location updating effect and imagination.在脑海中穿过门口会导致遗忘:位置更新效应与想象。
Memory. 2016;24(1):12-20. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.980429. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
9
Event memory and moving in a well-known environment.在熟悉的环境中进行事件记忆和移动。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Nov;41(8):1109-21. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0329-2.
10
Effect of reference frames and number of cues available on the spatial orientation of males and females in a virtual memory task.参考框架和可用线索数量对虚拟记忆任务中男性和女性空间定向的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2011 Jan 1;216(1):116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.026. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Deconstructing and reconstructing turn-taking in caregiver-infant interactions: a platform for embodied models of early cooperation.解构与重构照顾者与婴儿互动中的轮流模式:早期合作具身模型的一个平台。
J R Soc N Z. 2022 Jul 18;53(1):148-168. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2098781. eCollection 2023.
2
Visual event boundaries trigger forgetting despite active maintenance in visual working memory.视觉事件边界会触发遗忘,尽管在视觉工作记忆中进行了主动维持。
J Vis. 2024 Sep 3;24(9):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.9.9.
3
The Ubiquity of Time in Latent-cause Inference.
时间在潜在因果推断中的普遍性。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Nov 1;36(11):2442-2454. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02231.
4
Contextual inference in learning and memory.语境推理在学习和记忆中的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;27(1):43-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
5
Examining the role of information integration in the continued influence effect using an event segmentation approach.采用事件分割法考察信息整合在持续影响效应中的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 18;17(7):e0271566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271566. eCollection 2022.
6
A neural network model of when to retrieve and encode episodic memories.一个关于何时提取和编码情景记忆的神经网络模型。
Elife. 2022 Feb 10;11:e74445. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74445.
7
Clinician Perspectives on Unmet Needs for Mobile Technology Among Hospitalists: Workflow Analysis Based on Semistructured Interviews.临床医生对住院医师移动技术未满足需求的看法:基于半结构化访谈的工作流程分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jan 4;9(1):e28783. doi: 10.2196/28783.
8
Doorways do not always cause forgetting: a multimodal investigation.门并非总是导致遗忘:一项多模态研究。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Mar 8;9(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00536-3.
9
Conceptual Closure Elicited by Event Boundary Transitions Affects Commercial Communication Effectiveness.由事件边界转换引发的概念闭合影响商业沟通效果。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Apr 7;14:292. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00292. eCollection 2020.
10
Event Perception and Memory.事件感知和记忆。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:165-191. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051101.