Gerken U, Schaefer I, Mühlbach A, Gebhardt B, Elias G M, Kolip P
Universität Bremen, Institut für Public Health und Pflegeforschung, Bremen.
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Feb;74(2):112-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275709. Epub 2011 May 11.
In line with the National Action Plan "IN FORM" the German Federal Ministry of Health funds the establishment of 11 regional community health promotion networks (alliances). To meet quality development standards, an external evaluation project has been established in addition to the alliances' internal evaluation. Scientific monitoring focuses on alliance-spanning investigation of quality of planning, structures and processes and uses different methods and instruments (e.g., guided interviews, analytical framework, Goal Attainment Scaling). Regional networks also receive support for their efforts to quality development. Up to now concluding analysis can be done on aspects of planning quality based on findings of the analytical framework developed within the project. 5 selected results presented in the article reveal a heterogeneous picture: on one hand the standard on which the alliances' rationales on demands justifying the project's strategy are written at is very encouraging. The situation is similar with the descriptions of the work planning and statements concerning the sustainability at which the implemented activities are aimed. On the other hand, in explaination criteria like consideration of target group's needs or definition of goals the possibilities are not exhausted yet considering the state of the debate. Hence in similar future projects there is a clear necessity of assistance in approaching these aspects, provided preferably in an early stage of the planning phase.
根据“IN FORM”国家行动计划,德国联邦卫生部资助建立了11个区域社区健康促进网络(联盟)。为了达到质量发展标准,除了联盟的内部评估外,还设立了一个外部评估项目。科学监测重点是对规划质量、结构和流程进行跨联盟调查,并使用不同的方法和工具(如指导性访谈、分析框架、目标达成量表)。区域网络在质量发展方面的努力也得到了支持。到目前为止,可以根据项目中开发的分析框架的结果,对规划质量方面进行总结分析。文章中呈现的5个选定结果显示出一幅参差不齐的画面:一方面,联盟在阐述证明项目战略合理性的需求时所依据的标准非常令人鼓舞。工作规划的描述以及已实施活动所针对的可持续性声明的情况也是如此。另一方面,在诸如考虑目标群体需求或目标定义等解释标准方面,考虑到当前的辩论状况,潜力尚未完全挖掘出来。因此,在未来类似的项目中,显然有必要在处理这些方面提供协助,最好在规划阶段的早期提供。