Utzinger Jürg, Wyss Kaspar, Moto Daugla D, Tanner Marcel, Singer Burton H
Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Wallace Hall, NJ 08544, USA.
Clin Occup Environ Med. 2004 Feb;4(1):9-26. doi: 10.1016/j.coem.2003.09.004.
A critical appraisal has been presented of the CHOP for a large-scale energy infrastructure development project that was implemented in two of the world's poorest countries. The project is under close scrutiny from various independent monitoring groups, civil society organizations, and human rights groups. Reviewing the achievements and shortcomings permits the extraction of important lessons that will be critical for the future adoption of the CHOP in the current setting and for the implementation of additional CHOPs elsewhere in the developing world. The authors believe that the design must be flexible, efficient, and innovative so that a CHOP promptly can address pressing public health issues as they arise (eg, epidemic outbreak) and include the needs and demands of the concerned communities. An innovative feature of the current project is the high degree and mix of public-private partnerships. The project's CHOP also relies on partnerships. As elaborated elsewhere, public-private partnerships should be seen as a social experiment--they reveal promise but are not the solution for every problem. For this CHOP, the focus is on partnerships between a multinational consortium, government agencies, and international organizations. The partnerships also include civil society organizations for monitoring and evaluation and local NGOs designated for the implementation of the selected public health interventions within the CHOP. The governments and their respective health policies often form the umbrella under which the partnerships operate. With the increase in globalization, however, the importance and capacities of governments have diminished, and there is growing private-sector involvement. Private enterprise is seen as an efficient, innovative, pragmatic, and powerful means to achieve environmental and social sustainability. Experiences with the partnership configurations in the current CHOP are of importance for tackling grand challenges in global health by applying a systemic approach. Other innovations of the project in general, and the CHOP in particular, are the strong emphases on institutional-capacity building, integration, and sustainability. In countries like Chad and Cameroon, there are serious shortages of well-qualified health personnel. The CHOP described in this article provides leverage for initiating better healthcare that will reduce the high burden of disease in the developing world. Reducing mortality rates for infants and children younger than 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa requires massive scaling-up of malaria-control interventions (eg, large-scale distribution of ITNs to protect millions of African children), thereby approaching the Abuja targets (see Armstrong Schellenberg et al). The local NGOs that took a lead within the framework of the CHOP in the distribution of ITNs and accompanying health education messages can extend these activities to communities living outside the vicinity of the project area. Serious shortcomings of the current CHOP, consistently identified by the external monitoring groups, include the lack of a regional health plan, cumulative impact assessment, and provision of clean water and sanitation outside the narrowly defined project area. This point is of central importance, particularly for Chad, where access to clean water and improved sanitation facilities is low. Another limitation of the current CHOP is the insufficient amount of significance addressed to tuberculosis and the apparent lack of concerted control efforts against HIV infection, AIDS, and tuberculosis. These criticisms, however, must be balanced against the lack of clarity in international discourse about the proper extent of responsibility of the corporate sector for dealing with the health problems of countries in which they do business. In an elegant analysis, the environmental risk factor "unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene" was shown to be one of the major contributors to loss of healthy life, particularly in the developing world. Provision of clean water and sanitation is a key factor for sustainable control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths. Reduction of helminth infections might have a beneficial effect on the HIV and AIDS pandemic. The question still remains: What is, or should be, the scope and limits of responsibility of the corporate sector in solving these problems? There is a critical need for the monitoring and evaluation of the long-term impact of a CHOP that develops in parallel with a large development project, emphasizing the broadest possible determinants of health and well-being. To become operational, it requires the establishment and running of a longitudinal demographic surveillance system in the area and in adjacent areas that are unlikely to be affected by the project. This approach, coupled with regular household surveys for in-depth appraisal of health-seeking and asset indices, is the most promising source of data for impact measurement of health, poverty, and equity-related issues. It will facilitate subtle monitoring and surveillance activities, fostering a truly systemic approach by inclusion of all stake holders on the basis of the existing but constantly evolving system.
对在世界上两个最贫穷国家实施的大规模能源基础设施开发项目的社区健康行动计划(CHOP)进行了批判性评估。该项目受到了各种独立监测团体、民间社会组织和人权组织的密切审查。审视其成就与不足,能够提炼出重要经验教训,这对于当前环境下未来采用CHOP以及在发展中世界其他地方实施更多CHOP而言至关重要。作者认为,设计必须灵活、高效且创新,以便CHOP能够迅速应对紧迫的公共卫生问题(如疫情爆发),并纳入相关社区的需求和要求。当前项目的一个创新特点是公私伙伴关系的高度融合。该项目的CHOP也依赖伙伴关系。如在其他地方所阐述的,公私伙伴关系应被视为一种社会实验——它们展现出前景,但并非解决所有问题的办法。对于这个CHOP而言,重点在于跨国财团、政府机构和国际组织之间的伙伴关系。这些伙伴关系还包括用于监测和评估的民间社会组织以及被指定在CHOP内实施选定公共卫生干预措施的当地非政府组织。政府及其各自的卫生政策通常构成伙伴关系运作的保护伞。然而,随着全球化的加剧,政府的重要性和能力有所下降,私营部门的参与度不断提高。私营企业被视为实现环境和社会可持续性的高效、创新、务实且强大的手段。当前CHOP中伙伴关系配置的经验对于通过应用系统方法应对全球卫生领域的重大挑战具有重要意义。该项目总体上,特别是CHOP的其他创新之处在于对机构能力建设、整合和可持续性的高度重视。在乍得和喀麦隆等国家,合格卫生人员严重短缺。本文所述的CHOP为启动更好的医疗保健提供了助力,这将减轻发展中世界沉重的疾病负担。降低撒哈拉以南非洲5岁以下婴幼儿的死亡率需要大规模扩大疟疾控制干预措施(如大规模分发驱虫蚊帐以保护数百万非洲儿童),从而接近阿布贾目标(见阿姆斯特朗·谢伦贝格等人的研究)。在CHOP框架内率先分发驱虫蚊帐并附带健康教育信息的当地非政府组织,可以将这些活动扩展到项目区域附近以外的社区。外部监测团体一直指出的当前CHOP的严重不足包括缺乏区域卫生计划、累积影响评估以及在狭义项目区域之外提供清洁水和卫生设施。这一点至关重要,特别是对于乍得而言,该国获得清洁水和改善卫生设施的机会很低。当前CHOP的另一个局限性是对结核病关注不足,以及明显缺乏针对艾滋病毒感染、艾滋病和结核病的协同控制努力。然而,这些批评必须与国际话语中关于企业部门应对其开展业务国家的健康问题的适当责任范围缺乏明确性相权衡。在一项精妙的分析中,环境风险因素“不安全的水、卫生设施和个人卫生”被证明是导致健康生命损失的主要因素之一,特别是在发展中世界。提供清洁水和卫生设施是可持续控制血吸虫病和土壤传播蠕虫的关键因素。减少蠕虫感染可能对艾滋病毒和艾滋病大流行产生有益影响。问题仍然存在:企业部门在解决这些问题中的责任范围和限度是什么,或者应该是什么?迫切需要对与大型开发项目并行开展的CHOP的长期影响进行监测和评估,强调健康和福祉的尽可能广泛的决定因素。要使其运作起来,需要在该地区以及不太可能受项目影响的相邻地区建立并运行纵向人口监测系统。这种方法,再加上定期的家庭调查以深入评估就医情况和资产指数,是衡量健康、贫困和公平相关问题影响的最有前景的数据来源。它将促进细致的监测和监督活动,通过在现有但不断发展变化的系统基础上纳入所有利益相关者,培育一种真正的系统方法。