Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037-1300, USA.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Sep;30(7):1319-24. doi: 10.1002/nau.21028. Epub 2011 May 11.
Minimum important difference (MID) estimates the minimum degree of change in an instrument's score that correlates with subjective sense of improvement. The aim of this study was to estimate the MID for the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ) and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) using anchor and distribution-based approaches in patients with urge-predominant incontinence and whether MID changes over time.
This was a sub-analysis of a multi-center trial of 307 women with pure urge (11) or urge-predominant (296) incontinence who completed condition-specific instruments 10 weeks and 8 months after randomization to anticholinergic medication with or without behavioral therapy. We applied anchor-based methods only when the Kendall's rank correlations between the anchors (Global Perception of Improvement (GPI), Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), and incontinence episodes) and the incontinence instruments (UDI, UDI irritative subscale, IIQ, and OAB-q subscales) were ≥ 0.3. We applied three distribution-based methods to all instruments: effect sizes of ± 0.2 SD (small) and ± 0.5 SD (medium), and standard error of measurement of ± 1. Analyses were performed at both time points.
Anchor-based MIDs for the UDI ranged from -35 to -45 and -15 to -25 for the irritative subscale distribution-based methods MIDs for UDI and IIQ ranged between -10 to -25 and -19 to -49, respectively, reflective of a reduction in bother and symptom severity (SS). OAB-q subscale MIDs ranged from +5 to +12, denoting improved quality of life (HRQL) and -13 to -25, consistent with a reduction in SS.
The MID in women with urge-predominant UI for the UDI and UDI irritative are -35 and -15. Our findings are consistent with previously reported MIDs for the OAB-q subscales. Distribution-based method MIDs are lower values than anchor-based values. The MID did not typically change over the time.
最小有意义差异(MID)估计了仪器评分变化的最小程度,该变化与主观改善感相关。本研究的目的是使用基于锚定和分布的方法来估计在以急迫为主的尿失禁患者中使用尿失禁困扰量表(UDI)、尿失禁影响问卷(IIQ)和膀胱过度活动症问卷(OAB-q)的 MID,以及 MID 是否随时间变化。
这是一项多中心试验的子分析,共有 307 名单纯急迫性(11 名)或以急迫为主的(296 名)尿失禁患者完成了条件特异性问卷,这些患者在随机分组后 10 周和 8 个月接受了抗胆碱能药物治疗,同时或不联合行为疗法。仅当锚(整体改善感知(GPI)、患者满意度问卷(PSQ)和失禁发作)与失禁量表(UDI、UDI 刺激分量表、IIQ 和 OAB-q 分量表)之间的 Kendall 等级相关系数≥0.3 时,我们才应用基于锚定的方法。我们将三种基于分布的方法应用于所有仪器:±0.2 SD(小)和±0.5 SD(中)的效应大小,以及±1 的测量误差标准。分析在两个时间点进行。
基于锚定的 UDI MID 值范围为-35 至-45 和-15 至-25,基于分布的 UDI 和 IIQ MID 值范围分别为-10 至-25 和-19 至-49,反映了困扰和症状严重程度(SS)的降低。OAB-q 分量表的 MID 值范围为+5 至+12,表明生活质量(HRQL)得到改善,-13 至-25,与 SS 降低一致。
在以急迫为主的 UI 女性中,UDI 和 UDI 刺激分量表的 MID 值分别为-35 和-15。我们的发现与之前报道的 OAB-q 分量表的 MID 值一致。基于分布的方法的 MID 值低于基于锚定的方法值。MID 通常不会随时间变化。