• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在使用梯度回波序列和相同的八通道线圈阵列设计的情况下,对 3.0T 和 7.0T 腕部 MRI 的体外和体内比较。

In vitro and in vivo comparison of wrist MR imaging at 3.0 and 7.0 tesla using a gradient echo sequence and identical eight-channel coil array designs.

机构信息

Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Mar;33(3):661-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22419.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.22419
PMID:21563250
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate in vivo MR imaging of the wrist at 3.0 Tesla (T) and 7.0T quantitatively and qualitatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To enable unbiased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) comparisons, geometrically identical eight-channel receiver arrays were used at both field strengths. First, in vitro images of a phantom bottle were acquired at 3.0T and 7.0T to obtain an estimate of the maximum SNR gain that can be expected. MR images of the dominant wrist of 10 healthy volunteers were acquired at both field strengths. All measurements were done using the same sequence parameters. Quantitative SNR maps were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis and analyzed in several regions-of-interest. Furthermore, the images were qualitatively evaluated by two independent radiologists.

RESULTS

The quantitative analysis showed SNR increases of up to 100% at 7.0T compared with 3.0T, with considerable variation between different anatomical structures. The qualitative analysis revealed no significant difference in the visualization of anatomical structures comparing 3.0T and 7.0T MR images (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The presented results establish the SNR benefits of the transition from 3.0T to 7.0T for wrist imaging without bias by different array designs and based on exact, algebraic SNR quantification. The observed SNR increase nearly reaches expected values but varies greatly between different tissues. It does not necessarily improve the visibility of anatomic structures but adds valuable latitude for sequence optimization.

摘要

目的

在 3.0T 和 7.0T 下评估腕关节的活体 MRI 成像的定量和定性。

材料与方法

为了实现无偏的信噪比(SNR)比较,在两种场强下使用了几何形状完全相同的八通道接收阵列。首先,在 3.0T 和 7.0T 下采集了一个幻影瓶的体外图像,以获得可以预期的最大 SNR 增益的估计值。在两种场强下采集了 10 名健康志愿者的主要腕关节的 MR 图像。所有测量均使用相同的序列参数进行。在逐像素的基础上计算定量 SNR 图,并在几个感兴趣区域进行分析。此外,由两位独立的放射科医生对图像进行定性评估。

结果

定量分析显示,与 3.0T 相比,7.0T 的 SNR 增加高达 100%,不同解剖结构之间存在很大差异。定性分析显示,在比较 3.0T 和 7.0T MR 图像时,不同解剖结构的可视化没有明显差异(P>0.05)。

结论

本研究结果通过不同的阵列设计和基于精确的、代数的 SNR 量化,在没有偏差的情况下确立了从 3.0T 过渡到 7.0T 进行腕关节成像的 SNR 优势。观察到的 SNR 增加几乎达到了预期值,但在不同组织之间差异很大。它不一定能提高解剖结构的可见性,但为序列优化增加了有价值的余地。

相似文献

1
In vitro and in vivo comparison of wrist MR imaging at 3.0 and 7.0 tesla using a gradient echo sequence and identical eight-channel coil array designs.在使用梯度回波序列和相同的八通道线圈阵列设计的情况下,对 3.0T 和 7.0T 腕部 MRI 的体外和体内比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Mar;33(3):661-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22419.
2
Does high-resolution MR imaging have better accuracy than standard MR imaging for evaluation of the triangular fibrocartilage complex?对于三角纤维软骨复合体的评估,高分辨率磁共振成像(MR成像)是否比标准MR成像具有更高的准确性?
J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Oct;26(5):502-3. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0623.
3
Does high-resolution MR imaging have better accuracy than standard MR imaging for evaluation of the triangular fibrocartilage complex?在评估三角纤维软骨复合体方面,高分辨率磁共振成像(MR成像)的准确性是否优于标准MR成像?
J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Oct;25(5):487-91. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0371.
4
Study of ulnar variance with high-resolution MRI: correlation with triangular fibrocartilage complex and cartilage of ulnar side of wrist.高分辨率MRI对尺骨变异的研究:与三角纤维软骨复合体及腕尺侧软骨的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):714-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21084.
5
Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist.手腕的磁共振成像
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2001 Sep;5(3):217-26. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17545.
6
Direct magnetic resonance arthrography of the wrist with axial traction: a feasibility study to assess joint cartilage.腕关节直接磁共振关节造影术伴轴向牵引:评估关节软骨的可行性研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jul;34(1):239-44. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22615. Epub 2011 May 25.
7
[Direct MR arthrography of the wrist in comparison with arthroscopy: a prospective study on 125 patients].[手腕直接磁共振关节造影与关节镜检查的比较:对125例患者的前瞻性研究]
Rofo. 2003 Jul;175(7):911-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40434.
8
Three-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist: diagnostic performance compared to 1.5-T.手腕的3特斯拉磁共振成像:与1.5特斯拉相比的诊断性能
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Nov-Dec;33(6):934-9. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31819bc03f.
9
Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.在3.0特斯拉磁场下,采用各向同性三维稳态进动快速成像序列评估软骨修复组织的三维磁共振观察(MOCART)评分。
Invest Radiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):603-12. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b5333c.
10
Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.使用大幅欠采样各向同性投影重建稳态自由进动成像评估膝关节的关节软骨。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Jul;24(1):168-75. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20596.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of 3T and 7T magnetic resonance imaging for direct visualization of finger flexor pulley rupture: an ex-vivo study.3T 和 7T 磁共振成像在直接可视化手指屈肌腱滑车破裂中的比较:一项离体研究。
Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Nov;53(11):2469-2476. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04671-x. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
2
Variation in cartilage T2 and T2* mapping of the wrist: a comparison between 3- and 7-T MRI.腕关节软骨 T2 和 T2* 弛豫时间 mapping 的变化:3T 与 7T MRI 比较。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2023 Dec 14;7(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00394-1.
3
Relationship between Clinical Symptoms and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) Patients Utilizing the Piper MRI Diagnostic System.
使用派珀磁共振成像(MRI)诊断系统的颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者临床症状与磁共振成像的关系
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 13;10(20):4698. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204698.
4
Visualization of wrist anatomy-a comparison between 7T and 3T MRI.腕关节解剖结构的可视化:7T 与 3T MRI 的对比。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):1362-1370. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08165-5. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
5
Determining the optimal magnetic resonance imaging sequences for the efficient diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders.确定用于颞下颌关节紊乱症有效诊断的最佳磁共振成像序列。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Apr;11(4):1343-1353. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-67.
6
Selection and application of coils in temporomandibular joint MRI.颞下颌关节 MRI 中线圈的选择与应用。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Mar;49(3):20190002. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190002. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
7
Diffusion-weighted 7.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in Rats.7.0T 磁共振弥散加权成像在评估大鼠椎间盘退变中的应用。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Jan 5;131(1):63-68. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.221261.
8
MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparison between acquisitions at 7.0 T using dielectric pads and 3.0 T.颞下颌关节的磁共振成像:7.0T 使用介电垫与 3.0T 采集的比较
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Jan;46(1):20160280. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160280. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
9
Comparison of a 32-channel head coil and a 2-channel surface coil for MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 3.0 T.3.0T下用于颞下颌关节磁共振成像的32通道头部线圈与2通道表面线圈的比较
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(4):20150420. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150420. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Quantitative and qualitative comparison of MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 1.5 and 3.0 T using an optimized high-resolution protocol.使用优化的高分辨率方案对颞下颌关节在1.5T和3.0T时的磁共振成像进行定量和定性比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(1):20150240. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150240. Epub 2015 Sep 15.