Suppr超能文献

二线治疗晚期胰腺癌患者的最佳支持治疗(BSC)对比奥沙利铂、亚叶酸钙和 5-氟尿嘧啶(OFF)加 BSC:德国 CONKO 研究组的 III 期研究。

Best supportive care (BSC) versus oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (OFF) plus BSC in patients for second-line advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III-study from the German CONKO-study group.

机构信息

Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Charité, Centrum für Tumormedizin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jul;47(11):1676-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 May 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine usually given until progressive disease (PD) is the main first-line treatment option for patients with inoperable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Currently there is no accepted active regimen for second-line chemotherapy. Previous phase II studies suggest clinical relevant activity of oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-FU (OFF). We initiated a phase III multicentre study comparing OFF versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with APC progressing while on gemcitabine therapy.

METHODS

In this open randomized study, patients with CT and/or MRI confirmed progressive disease while on gemcitabine therapy were randomized 1:1 to OFF or BSC. Stratification included duration of first-line therapy (<3, 3 to 6 and >6 months), performance status (KPS 70-80%; 90-100%) and tumour stage (M1/M0). OFF consisted of folinic acid 200mg/m(2) followed by 5-fluorouracil 2g/m(2) (24h) on d1, d8, d15, d22 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on days 8 and 22. After a rest of 3 weeks the next cycle was started on d43. A total of 165 patients were calculated to demonstrate a doubling of survival time after progression on first-line therapy.

RESULTS

After inclusion of forty six patients the trial was terminated according to predefined protocol regulations due to insufficient accrual (lack of acceptance of BSC by patients and physicians. Patient characteristics were well balanced between both study arms. The OFF regimen was well tolerated with more patients with grade I/II paraesthesia and grade II/III nausea/emesis and diarrhoea. Median second-line survival was 4.82 [95% Confidence Interval; 4.29-5.35] months for OFF treatment and 2.30 [95% CI; 1.76-2.83] months with BSC alone (0.45 [95% CI: 0.24-0.83], p = 0.008). Median overall survival for the sequence GEM-OFF was 9.09 [95% CI: 6.97-11.21] and 7.90 [95% CI: 4.95-10.84] months for GEM-BSC (0.50 [95% CI: 0.27-0.95], p = 0.031) respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Although stopped prematurely, this randomized trial provides at first time evidence for the benefit of second-line chemotherapy as compared to BSC alone for patients with APC. OFF significantly prolonged survival time compared to BSC alone after failure of first-line therapy with gemcitabine.

摘要

背景

吉西他滨通常在疾病进展(PD)时使用,是不可切除的晚期胰腺癌(APC)患者的一线主要治疗选择。目前尚无公认的二线化疗有效方案。先前的 II 期研究表明奥沙利铂、亚叶酸和 5-FU(OFF)具有临床相关活性。我们启动了一项 III 期多中心研究,比较了 APC 患者在接受吉西他滨治疗时进展后的 OFF 与最佳支持治疗(BSC)。

方法

在这项开放随机研究中,接受 CT 和/或 MRI 证实的在接受吉西他滨治疗时进展的患者按 1:1 随机分为 OFF 组或 BSC 组。分层包括一线治疗持续时间(<3、3-6 和>6 个月)、表现状态(KPS 70-80%;90-100%)和肿瘤分期(M1/M0)。OFF 方案包括亚叶酸 200mg/m2,然后在第 1、8、15、22 天给予氟尿嘧啶 2g/m2(24 小时),第 8 和 22 天给予奥沙利铂 85mg/m2。休息 3 周后,在下一个周期的第 43 天开始。预计将有 165 名患者接受治疗,以证明一线治疗后进展时的生存时间延长一倍。

结果

纳入 46 例患者后,根据预先制定的方案规定,由于入组不足(患者和医生不接受 BSC)而终止试验。两组患者的特征均平衡良好。OFF 方案耐受性良好,更多患者出现 1/2 级感觉异常和 2/3 级恶心/呕吐和腹泻。OFF 治疗的二线中位生存时间为 4.82 [95%置信区间;4.29-5.35]个月,单独 BSC 治疗为 2.30 [95%CI;1.76-2.83]个月(0.45 [95%CI:0.24-0.83],p=0.008)。GEM-OFF 序列的中位总生存期为 9.09 [95%CI:6.97-11.21],GEM-BSC 为 7.90 [95%CI:4.95-10.84]个月(0.50 [95%CI:0.27-0.95],p=0.031)。

结论

尽管提前终止,但这项随机试验首次提供了证据,表明与单独接受 BSC 相比,二线化疗可为 APC 患者带来获益。与单独接受 BSC 相比,OFF 在吉西他滨一线治疗失败后显著延长了生存时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验