Anaesthesiology and Community & Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Anaesthesia. 2011 Jun;66(6):509-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06712.x.
Although ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia has gained in popularity, few data exist describing the optimal location(s) to inject local anaesthetic. Our objective was to compare, for interscalene blocks, the effectiveness of an injection between the middle scalene muscle and brachial plexus sheath (peri-plexus) with an injection within the brachial plexus sheath (intra-plexus). We enrolled 170 patients undergoing shoulder surgery with general anaesthesia and interscalene block in this randomised, controlled trial. Our primary outcome variable was loss of shoulder abduction. Block quality was also measured and defined by an evaluation of onset time, sensory and motor loss and duration. There was no difference between the two groups in block onset times or block quality. After adjusting for sex, age and volume injected, intra-plexus blocks lasted a mean of 2.6 h (16%) longer (95% CI 0.25-5.01, p=0.03) than peri-plexus blocks.
虽然超声引导下的区域麻醉已经越来越受欢迎,但关于局部麻醉剂的最佳注射部位的数据却很少。我们的目的是比较在肩胛下肌和臂丛神经鞘(peri-plexus)之间进行注射与在臂丛神经鞘内进行注射(intra-plexus)对于肩胛下神经阻滞的效果。我们在这项随机对照试验中招募了 170 名接受全身麻醉和肩胛下神经阻滞的肩部手术患者。我们的主要结局变量是肩部外展丧失。还测量了阻滞质量,并通过评估起效时间、感觉和运动丧失以及持续时间来定义。两组在阻滞起效时间或阻滞质量方面没有差异。在校正性别、年龄和注射量后,intra-plexus 阻滞的平均持续时间比 peri-plexus 阻滞长 2.6 小时(16%)(95%CI 0.25-5.01,p=0.03)。