Suppr超能文献

电子处方系统的实施是否会产生意外的用药错误?通过对报告的用药事件进行分析,研究社会技术环境。

Does the implementation of an electronic prescribing system create unintended medication errors? A study of the sociotechnical context through the analysis of reported medication incidents.

机构信息

University of Birmingham, School of Health and Population Sciences, Birmingham, Edgbaston Campus, B15 2TH, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 May 12;11:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Even though electronic prescribing systems are widely advocated as one of the most effective means of improving patient safety, they may also introduce new risks that are not immediately obvious. Through the study of specific incidents related to the processes involved in the administration of medication, we sought to find out if the prescribing system had unintended consequences in creating new errors. The focus of this study was a large acute hospital in the Midlands in the United Kingdom, which implemented a Prescribing, Information and Communication System (PICS).

METHODS

This exploratory study was based on a survey of routinely collected medication incidents over five months. Data were independently reviewed by two of the investigators with a clinical pharmacology and nursing background respectively, and grouped into broad types: sociotechnical incidents (related to human interactions with the system) and non-sociotechnical incidents. Sociotechnical incidents were distinguished from the others because they occurred at the point where the system and the professional intersected and would not have occurred in the absence of the system. The day of the week and time of day that an incident occurred were tested using univariable and multivariable analyses. We acknowledge the limitations of conducting analyses of data extracted from incident reports as it is widely recognised that most medication errors are not reported and may contain inaccurate data. Interpretation of results must therefore be tentative.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 485 incidents, a modest 15% (n = 73) were distinguished as sociotechnical issues and thus may be unique to hospitals that have such systems in place. These incidents were further analysed and subdivided into categories in order to identify aspects of the context which gave rise to adverse situations and possible risks to patient safety. The analysis of sociotechnical incidents by time of day and day of week indicated a trend for increased proportions of these types of incidents occurring on Sundays.

CONCLUSION

Introducing an electronic prescribing system has the potential to give rise to new types of risks to patient safety. Being aware of these types of errors is important to the clinical and technical implementers of such systems in order to, where possible, design out unintended problems, highlight training requirements, and revise clinical practice protocols.

摘要

背景

尽管电子处方系统被广泛认为是提高患者安全的最有效手段之一,但它们也可能引入新的风险,这些风险并不明显。通过研究与药物管理过程相关的特定事件,我们试图确定处方系统是否在创建新错误方面产生了意外后果。本研究的重点是英国中部地区的一家大型急性医院,该医院实施了处方、信息和通信系统(PICS)。

方法

这项探索性研究基于对五个月内常规收集的药物事件的调查。数据由两位具有临床药理学和护理背景的调查员分别独立审查,并分为广泛的类型:社会技术事件(与系统与人的交互有关)和非社会技术事件。社会技术事件与其他事件区分开来,因为它们发生在系统与专业人员交叉的地方,如果没有系统,这些事件就不会发生。使用单变量和多变量分析测试事件发生的日期和时间。我们承认,从事件报告中提取数据进行分析存在局限性,因为人们普遍认识到,大多数药物错误都没有报告,并且可能包含不准确的数据。因此,必须谨慎解释结果。

结果

在总共 485 起事件中,只有 15%(n=73)被确定为社会技术问题,因此可能仅存在于安装此类系统的医院中。这些事件进一步进行了分析和细分,以确定引发不良情况和可能对患者安全构成风险的上下文方面。按时间和星期几分析社会技术事件表明,这些类型的事件在星期日发生的比例呈上升趋势。

结论

引入电子处方系统有可能给患者安全带来新的风险类型。了解这些类型的错误对于此类系统的临床和技术实施者非常重要,以便尽可能设计出意外问题,突出培训需求,并修改临床实践协议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c614/3116457/5e83392a42e1/1472-6947-11-29-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验