Suppr超能文献

紧急调度与公众获取 AED 之间的联系:早期除颤的潜在影响。

A link between emergency dispatch and public access AEDs: potential implications for early defibrillation.

机构信息

EMS Division of Public Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2011 Aug;82(8):995-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public access defibrillation can improve survival but is involved in only a small fraction of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. One approach to increase involvement is to couple emergency dispatch with mapping technology to identify public access automated external defibrillators (AEDs) that are on-site or nearby.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort investigation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who received dispatch by a community dispatch center between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2009. The dispatch system is linked to the public access AED registry. The technology enables dispatcher alert of an on-site AED and the potential to alert for an AED within 0.1 mile. We report the observed and potential frequency of AED involvement.

RESULTS

Of the 763 cardiac arrest events, 4.2% (32/763) had an AED applied by non-EMS persons, 1.3% (10/763) by police and 2.9% (22/763) in layperson settings. Among the remaining 731 where an AED was not applied, 8.1% (59/731) had an AED identified through dispatch; 18 with an AED on-site and an additional 41 with an AED within 0.1 mile. When restricting to ventricular fibrillation arrests, 8.9% (16/179) had an AED applied by non-EMS persons, 2.8% (5/179) by police and 6.1% (11/179) in layperson settings. Among the remaining 163 where an AED was not applied, 11.7% (19/163) had an AED identified through dispatch; 9 with an AED on-site and an additional 10 with an AED within 0.1 mile.

CONCLUSION

A working link between emergency dispatch and an AED registry may provide an opportunity to improve resuscitation.

摘要

背景

公众可获取的除颤器可以提高生存率,但仅在一小部分院外心脏骤停中使用。增加参与度的一种方法是将紧急调度与地图技术相结合,以识别现场或附近的公众可获取自动体外除颤器(AED)。

方法

我们对 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日期间通过社区调度中心调度的院外心脏骤停患者进行了回顾性观察队列研究。该调度系统与公众可获取的 AED 注册中心相连。该技术使调度员能够获得现场 AED 的警报,并有可能在 0.1 英里内获得 AED 的警报。我们报告了观察到的和潜在的 AED 参与频率。

结果

在 763 例心脏骤停事件中,有 4.2%(32/763)由非 EMS 人员使用 AED 进行除颤,有 1.3%(10/763)由警察使用,有 2.9%(22/763)在非专业人员环境下使用。在其余 731 例未使用 AED 的事件中,有 8.1%(59/731)通过调度识别出 AED;其中 18 例 AED 现场可用,另外 41 例 AED 距离现场 0.1 英里以内。将限制在心室颤动性心脏骤停时,有 8.9%(16/179)由非 EMS 人员使用 AED 进行除颤,有 2.8%(5/179)由警察使用,有 6.1%(11/179)在非专业人员环境下使用。在其余 163 例未使用 AED 的事件中,有 11.7%(19/163)通过调度识别出 AED;其中 9 例 AED 现场可用,另外 10 例 AED 距离现场 0.1 英里以内。

结论

紧急调度和 AED 注册中心之间的有效链接可能为提高复苏成功率提供机会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验