• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾结石和输尿管结石:技术与结果。

Modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney and ureteral stones: technique and results.

机构信息

Service d'Urologie CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.031
PMID:21570174
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard treatment for kidney stones >2cm. Recently, a novel approach in the modified supine lithotomy position has been developed.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate with a video our technique of supine PCNL (sPCNL) and present our experience.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From September 2009 to August 2010, 47 consecutive patients were prospectively evaluated. There were 31 single, 9 multiple, and 7 staghorn stones. The mean body mass index was 26.1±5 (range: 17.3-45.7), the mean stone size was 29.6±15.3mm (range: 10-75), and patients' American Society of Anesthesiologists scores were 1, 2, and 3 in 31, 11, and 5 cases, respectively.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

Patients were positioned in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position. The details of the technique are shown in the film.

MEASUREMENTS

Success was defined as patients free of stones or with residual stone fragments <4mm.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Average operative room occupation time was 123.5±51.2min (range: 50-245). In the single, multiple, and staghorn stone groups, the immediate success rate after sPCNL was 90%, 78%, and 43%, respectively. Complications included one fever, two incidents of pyelonephritis, one renal colic, two urinary fistulae, one postoperative hemorrhage, and one incident of acute urinary retention. Mean hospital stay was 3.4±1.9 d (range: 2-12). Nine patients (19%) had a secondary procedure (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or flexible ureterorenoscopy). At 3 mo, the success rate was 97%, 100%, and 100% in the single, multiple, and staghorn stone groups, respectively. However, the limitation of this study is its design, which is descriptive rather than comparative.

CONCLUSIONS

sPCNL is a safe and reproducible method. It offers the advantage of simultaneous retrograde and antegrade endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery, and we believe it is a further advancement in stone management. In addition, it is easier from the anesthetist point of view than the traditional prone approach. In our hands, it meant a simplification of the operative technique, resulting in a more time-efficient procedure.

摘要

背景

经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)是治疗>2cm 肾结石的标准治疗方法。最近,一种改良仰卧截石位的新方法已经开发出来。

目的

通过视频展示我们的仰卧 PCNL(sPCNL)技术并介绍我们的经验。

设计、设置和参与者:从 2009 年 9 月至 2010 年 8 月,前瞻性评估了 47 例连续患者。其中 31 例为单发结石,9 例为多发结石,7 例为鹿角形结石。平均体重指数为 26.1±5(范围:17.3-45.7),平均结石大小为 29.6±15.3mm(范围:10-75),患者的美国麻醉师协会评分分别为 31 例 1 分、11 例 2 分和 5 例 3 分。

手术步骤

患者置于改良仰卧瓦尔迪维亚体位。技术细节见影片。

测量

成功定义为患者无结石或残留结石碎片<4mm。

结果和局限性

平均手术室占用时间为 123.5±51.2min(范围:50-245)。在单发、多发和鹿角形结石组中,sPCNL 后的即刻成功率分别为 90%、78%和 43%。并发症包括发热 1 例、肾盂肾炎 2 例、肾绞痛 1 例、尿瘘 2 例、术后出血 1 例、急性尿潴留 1 例。平均住院时间为 3.4±1.9d(范围:2-12)。9 例(19%)接受了二次手术(体外冲击波碎石术或软性输尿管镜碎石术)。3 个月时,单发、多发和鹿角形结石组的成功率分别为 97%、100%和 100%。然而,本研究的局限性在于其设计,它是描述性的,而不是比较性的。

结论

sPCNL 是一种安全且可重复的方法。它具有同时进行逆行和顺行内镜联合肾内手术的优势,我们认为这是结石处理的进一步进展。此外,从麻醉师的角度来看,它比传统的俯卧位方法更容易。在我们手中,这意味着手术技术的简化,从而使手术过程更高效。

相似文献

1
Modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney and ureteral stones: technique and results.改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾结石和输尿管结石:技术与结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
2
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy?加尔达考改良仰卧瓦尔迪维亚体位下的内镜联合肾内手术:经皮肾镜取石术的新标准?
Eur Urol. 2008 Dec;54(6):1393-403. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.073. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
3
Complete stone clearance using a modified supine position: initial experience and comparison with prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.采用改良仰卧位实现完全结石清除:初步经验及与俯卧位经皮肾镜碎石术的比较。
J Endourol. 2013 Jun;27(6):705-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0650. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
4
Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial.经皮肾镜取石术中改良仰卧位与俯卧位用于单次经皮穿刺即可治疗的肾结石:一项前瞻性随机试验
Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.067. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
5
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery for Simultaneous Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Study.内镜联合肾内手术治疗同时性肾输尿管结石:一项回顾性研究
J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1056-1061. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0329. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
6
The best calyceal tract approach for treating renal stones with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的最佳肾盏通路。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 May;96(5):575-9.
7
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (PCNL) as an effective and safe procedure for large renal stones.微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)治疗大肾结石的有效且安全的方法。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E1022-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11191.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of large stones within horseshoe kidneys.经皮肾镜取石术治疗马蹄肾内的大结石。
Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):426-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.018.
9
[Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in subjects over the age of 70: a multicentre retrospective study of 210 cases].70岁以上患者的经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL):210例多中心回顾性研究
Prog Urol. 2004 Dec;14(6):1140-5.
10
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Galdakao - Modified Supine Valdivia position: A prospective analysis.加尔达考-改良仰卧瓦尔迪维亚体位经皮肾镜取石术的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性分析。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016 Jul 4;88(2):93-6. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2016.2.93.

引用本文的文献

1
Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Barts 'Flank-Free' Modified Supine Position with 24-Hour Discharge: A Single-Center Experience.在巴茨“无侧腹”改良仰卧位下进行无管经皮肾镜取石术并实现24小时出院:单中心经验
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 18;61(4):748. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040748.
2
Simultaneous tubeless supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy and cystolitholapaxy in a patient with spina bifida.一名脊柱裂患者同时进行无管仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术和膀胱结石碎石术。
Urol Case Rep. 2024 Sep 11;57:102847. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2024.102847. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Oblique supine position versus prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
经皮肾镜取石术采用斜仰卧位与俯卧位的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Jun;18(2):244-253. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.126453. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
4
Modified Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Elderly: Outcomes and Safety.老年患者改良仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:疗效与安全性
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 21;12(14):4807. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144807.
5
Ultrasound-Only Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is Safe and Effective Compared to Fluoroscopy-Directed Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.与荧光透视引导经皮肾镜取石术相比,仅超声引导经皮肾镜取石术既安全又有效。
J Endourol. 2023 Jun;37(6):634-641. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0761. Epub 2023 May 9.
6
Is supine position safe and effective for the percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Clinical experiences, tip and tricks in learning curve and PSAA technique.仰卧位对于经皮肾镜取石术是否安全有效?学习曲线中的临床经验、技巧及 PSAA 技术。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Mar 30;51(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01431-9.
7
Factors Predicting Outcomes of Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Large Single-Centre Experience.预测仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术结局的因素:大型单中心经验
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 25;12(12):1956. doi: 10.3390/jpm12121956.
8
Patients with encrusted ureteral stents can be treated by a single session combined endourological approach.有结石嵌顿的输尿管支架患者可通过单次联合腔内治疗方法进行治疗。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 May-Jun;47(3):574-583. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0511.
9
PCNL in COPD patient in the sit position under local infiltration anesthesia case report.PCNL 在 COPD 患者坐位下局部浸润麻醉中的应用:病例报告
BMC Urol. 2020 Jun 17;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00640-3.
10
Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: tips and tricks.仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术:技巧与窍门
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S381-S388. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.07.09.