Public Health Genomics Unit, Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki and National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
J Affect Disord. 2011 Jun;131(1-3):393-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.12.008.
The aim of this study was to characterize at the population level how innate features of temperament relate to experience of depressive mood and anxiety, and whether these symptoms have separable temperamental backgrounds.
The study subjects were 4773 members of the population-based Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966, a culturally and genetically homogeneous study sample. Temperament was measured at age 31 using the temperament items of the Temperament and Character Inventory and a separate Pessimism score. Depressive mood was assessed based on a previous diagnosis of depressive disorder or symptoms of depression according to the Hopkins Symptom Check List - 25. Anxiety was assessed analogously.
High levels of Harm avoidance and Pessimism were related to both depressive mood (effect sizes; d=0.84 and d=1.25, respectively) and depressive disorder (d=0.68 and d=0.68, respectively). Of the dimensions of Harm avoidance, Anticipatory worry and Fatigability had the strongest effects. Symptoms of depression and anxiety showed very similar underlying temperament patterns.
Although Harm avoidance and Pessimism appear to be important endophenotype candidates for depression and anxiety, their potential usefulness as endophenotypes, and whether they meet all the suggested criteria for endophenotypes will remain to be confirmed in future studies.
Personality characteristics of Pessimism and Harm avoidance, in particular its dimensions Anticipatory worry and Fatigability, are strongly related to symptoms of depression and anxiety as well as to depressive disorder in this population. These temperamental features may be used as dimensional susceptibility factors in etiological studies of depression, which may aid in the development of improved clinical practice.
本研究旨在从人群水平上描述气质的先天特征与抑郁情绪和焦虑体验的关系,以及这些症状是否具有可分离的气质背景。
研究对象为基于人群的 1966 年芬兰北部出生队列的 4773 名成员,这是一个文化和遗传均一的研究样本。气质在 31 岁时使用气质特征问卷和单独的悲观评分进行测量。抑郁情绪根据以前的抑郁障碍诊断或根据 Hopkins 症状检查清单-25 的抑郁症状进行评估。焦虑情况则通过类似方法进行评估。
高水平的回避和悲观与抑郁情绪(效应大小,d=0.84 和 d=1.25)和抑郁障碍(d=0.68 和 d=0.68)均相关。回避的维度中,预期担忧和疲劳感的影响最大。抑郁和焦虑症状表现出非常相似的潜在气质模式。
尽管回避和悲观似乎是抑郁和焦虑的重要候选内表型,但它们作为内表型的潜在有用性,以及它们是否符合所有内表型的建议标准,仍有待未来研究证实。
在该人群中,悲观和回避的人格特征,尤其是其维度预期担忧和疲劳感,与抑郁和焦虑症状以及抑郁障碍密切相关。这些气质特征可以作为抑郁病因学研究的维度易感性因素,这可能有助于改善临床实践。