• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国农村地区胆总管结石病的管理:是健康差距还是健康机会?

Choledocholithiasis management in rural America: health disparity or health opportunity?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2011 Oct;170(2):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.03.040. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2011.03.040
PMID:21571311
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Choledocholithiasis (CDL) management is dictated by local expertise, individual training, and availability of appropriate staff. This study evaluates the management of CDL between urban and rural communities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing inpatient management of CDL were identified from the 2007 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Availability of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was determined from the 2007 American Hospital Association survey. The proportion of common bile duct exploration (CBDE), ERCP, or percutaneous (PERC) interventions were compared across census regions and National Centers for Health Statistics (NCHS) urban-rural classes. The NCHS urban-rural classification scheme divides counties from most populous (NCHS 1) to rural (NCHS 6). Proportions were compared using the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) approach.

RESULTS

We estimated 111,021 CDL hospitalizations in the U.S. in 2007. Of these, 67% had a coded intervention. Intervention frequencies were similar across census regions. Comparisons across NCHS classes revealed higher proportions of ERCP in urban areas (NCHS 1-4) while a higher proportion of CBDE was seen in rural areas (NCHS 5-6). ERCP availability was high in metropolitan areas (available in 35%-44% of hospitals NCHS 1-4) and low in rural areas (25% of NCHS 5 hospitals and 5% NCHS 6). PERC management was similar across NCHS classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural hospitals and communities need surgeons trained in CBDE, where ERCP expertise may not be readily available. Feasible ways of expanding ERCP coverage to the nation's rural areas need to be explored. These observations may impact surgical training at least for those targeting careers in rural surgery.

摘要

背景

胆总管结石(CDL)的治疗方法取决于当地的专业知识、个人培训和合适人员的可用性。本研究评估了城乡社区之间 CDL 的治疗方法。

材料和方法

从 2007 年医疗保健成本和利用项目中确定了接受 CDL 住院治疗的患者。从 2007 年美国医院协会调查中确定了内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的可用性。比较了普查区和国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)城乡分类的胆总管探查术(CBDE)、ERCP 或经皮(PERC)干预的比例。NCHS 城乡分类方案将各县从人口最多的县(NCHS1)到农村县(NCHS6)进行分类。使用 95%置信区间(95%CI)方法比较比例。

结果

我们估计 2007 年美国有 111,021 例 CDL 住院患者。其中,67%的患者有编码干预。普查区的干预频率相似。NCHS 分类比较显示,城市地区(NCHS1-4)的 ERCP 比例较高,而农村地区(NCHS5-6)的 CBDE 比例较高。大都市地区的 ERCP 可用性较高(NCHS1-4 中有 35%-44%的医院提供),而农村地区的可用性较低(NCHS5 医院中有 25%,NCHS6 医院中有 5%)。PERC 管理在 NCHS 分类中相似。

结论

农村医院和社区需要接受 CBDE 培训的外科医生,因为 ERCP 专业知识可能不容易获得。需要探索向全国农村地区扩大 ERCP 覆盖范围的可行方法。这些观察结果可能会影响外科培训,至少会影响那些针对农村手术职业的培训。

相似文献

1
Choledocholithiasis management in rural America: health disparity or health opportunity?美国农村地区胆总管结石病的管理:是健康差距还是健康机会?
J Surg Res. 2011 Oct;170(2):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.03.040. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
2
An urban-rural blight? Choledocholithiasis presentation and treatment.城乡衰败?胆总管结石的表现和治疗。
J Surg Res. 2012 Apr;173(2):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.031. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
3
NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties.国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)的县城乡分类方案。
Vital Health Stat 2. 2012 Jan(154):1-65.
4
National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores.使用倾向评分对胆总管结石治疗中院内资源利用情况进行的全国性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):186-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0235-1. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
5
2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties.2013年国家卫生统计中心县域城乡分类方案
Vital Health Stat 2. 2014 Apr(166):1-73.
6
Surgeons, ERCP, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: do we need a standard approach for common bile duct stones?外科医生、内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)及腹腔镜胆总管探查术:我们是否需要一种治疗胆总管结石的标准方法?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):414-423. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4273-z. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
7
Optimizing choledocholithiasis management: a cost-effectiveness analysis.优化胆总管结石管理:一项成本效益分析。
Arch Surg. 2007 Jan;142(1):43-8; discussion 49. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.1.43.
8
The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: sphincterotomy versus common bile duct exploration as a primary technique in the management of choledocholithiasis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的作用:括约肌切开术与胆总管探查术作为胆总管结石治疗的主要技术比较
Am Surg. 1993 Feb;59(2):78-84.
9
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.胆囊和胆管结石的单步治疗:一种内镜-腹腔镜联合技术。
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
10
Choledocholithiasis: overdiagnosed endoscopically and undertreated laparoscopically.胆总管结石:内镜下过度诊断,腹腔镜下治疗不足。
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Jun;78(6):487-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04540.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology and outcomes of choledocholithiasis and cholangitis in the United States: trends and urban-rural variations.美国胆总管结石和胆管炎的流行病学和结局:趋势和城乡差异。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02868-3.
2
Systematic Review: Impact of Social Determinants of Health on the Management and Prognosis of Gallstone Disease.系统评价:健康的社会决定因素对胆结石疾病管理和预后的影响
Health Equity. 2022 Oct 27;6(1):819-835. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0063. eCollection 2022.
3
Rural-Urban Differences in Esophagectomy for Cancer.
食管癌切除术的城乡差异
Kans J Med. 2021 Dec 2;14(3):292-297. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol14.15597. eCollection 2021.
4
Stricter national standards are required for credentialing of endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography in the United States.美国需要更严格的内镜逆行胰胆管造影认证标准。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 21;25(27):3468-3483. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3468.
5
Disparities in Surgical Access: A Systematic Literature Review, Conceptual Model, and Evidence Map.手术可及性的差异:系统文献综述、概念模型与证据图谱
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Mar;228(3):276-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.028.
6
Surgeons, ERCP, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: do we need a standard approach for common bile duct stones?外科医生、内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)及腹腔镜胆总管探查术:我们是否需要一种治疗胆总管结石的标准方法?
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):414-423. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4273-z. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
7
Endoscopic treatment of acute biliary diseases: have we optimized the value of inpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?急性胆道疾病的内镜治疗:我们是否已优化住院患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的价值?
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;12(7):1160-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 19.