Suppr超能文献

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的作用:括约肌切开术与胆总管探查术作为胆总管结石治疗的主要技术比较

The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: sphincterotomy versus common bile duct exploration as a primary technique in the management of choledocholithiasis.

作者信息

Johnson A S, Ferrara J J, Steinberg S M, Gassen G M, Hollier L H, Flint L M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana 70012.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1993 Feb;59(2):78-84.

PMID:8476146
Abstract

253 patients underwent diagnostic or therapeutic intervention for a presumed diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. In 104 (mean age, 60 years) the diagnosis was confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Of this group, 70 patients first underwent a total of 102 attempts at endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-S). Success (clearing the common duct of stones) was achieved in 43 patients (61%), though an average of 1.5 ERCP-S/patient was required (maximum of four per patient). Of the 27 in whom ERCP-S failed, 20 went on to CBDE, which was successful in 18. Significant morbidity occurred in 12 (17%) ERCP-S patients, including hemorrhage. There were no deaths. Of the 34 patients who first underwent CBDE, 30 were cleared of common duct stones (88%). ERCP-S was subsequently employed to retrieve retained stones in three patients. Significant morbidity was documented in three (9%). No patients required perioperative blood transfusion. There were no deaths. While there is, as expected, a lower initial success rate with ERCP-S than with CBDE, the fact that ERCP-S is a less invasive procedure than is CBDE justifies its preferential utilization. However, patients must be informed that successful ERCP-S may require multiple visits to the endoscopy suite. Furthermore, the morbid consequences of ERCP-S, particularly hemorrhage, cannot be understated.

摘要

253例患者因疑似胆总管结石接受了诊断性或治疗性干预。其中104例(平均年龄60岁)经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)或胆总管探查(CBDE)确诊。在这组患者中,70例患者首先共接受了102次内镜括约肌切开术(ERCP-S)尝试。43例患者(61%)成功(清除胆总管结石),尽管每位患者平均需要进行1.5次ERCP-S(每位患者最多4次)。在27例ERCP-S失败的患者中,20例继而接受了CBDE,其中18例成功。12例(17%)ERCP-S患者发生了严重并发症,包括出血。无死亡病例。在34例首先接受CBDE的患者中,30例清除了胆总管结石(88%)。随后3例患者采用ERCP-S取出残留结石。3例(9%)有严重并发症记录。无患者需要围手术期输血。无死亡病例。虽然正如预期的那样,ERCP-S的初始成功率低于CBDE,但ERCP-S比CBDE侵入性小这一事实证明了其优先使用的合理性。然而,必须告知患者,成功的ERCP-S可能需要多次前往内镜检查室。此外,ERCP-S的不良后果,尤其是出血,不容小觑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验