Suppr超能文献

吉西他滨在局部晚期胰腺癌放化疗中的应用:一项荟萃分析。

Gemcitabine in the chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2011 May;99(2):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 May 14.

Abstract

AIMS

Whether gemcitabine based chemoradiotherapy (GEM-based CRT) is superior to 5-fluorouracil based chemoradiotherapy (5-FU-based CRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) remains uncertain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of GEM-based CRT compared with 5-FU-based CRT.

METHODS

Electronic database including Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials register, PubMed (update to December 2010) and manual bibliography searches were carried out. A meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or other comparative studies comparing GEM-based CRT and 5-FU-based CRT were performed.

RESULTS

Three RCTs and one retrospective comparative study including 229 patients were assessed. Meta-analysis showed survival advantage of GEM-based CRT compared with 5-FU-based CRT for 12-month (12-mo) survival rates (SRs) (RR=1.54, 95% CI 1.05-2.26, p=0.03). Moreover, there were also trends of benefit for SR after 6-months (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.98-1.30, p=0.09) and 24-months (24-mo: RR 2.41, 95% CI 0.90-6.48, p=0.08), though the trends did not reach statistical significance. More frequent severe acute hematologic toxicities were found in the GEM-based CRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis found that GEM-based CRT was better than 5-FU-based CRT in the treatment of LAPC, especially for 12-mo SRs. However, the acute toxicity should be carefully regarded.

摘要

目的

吉西他滨为基础的放化疗(GEM 为基础的 CRT)是否优于 5-氟尿嘧啶为基础的放化疗(5-FU 为基础的 CRT)用于局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)仍不确定。本研究的目的是评估 GEM 为基础的 CRT 与 5-FU 为基础的 CRT 的疗效。

方法

检索 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验登记处、PubMed(更新至 2010 年 12 月)和手工文献检索电子数据库。对所有比较 GEM 为基础的 CRT 和 5-FU 为基础的 CRT 的随机临床试验(RCT)或其他对照研究进行荟萃分析。

结果

3 项 RCT 和 1 项回顾性对照研究共纳入 229 例患者。荟萃分析显示,GEM 为基础的 CRT 与 5-FU 为基础的 CRT 相比,12 个月生存率(SR)具有生存优势(RR=1.54,95%CI 1.05-2.26,p=0.03)。此外,6 个月(RR 1.13,95%CI 0.98-1.30,p=0.09)和 24 个月(24-mo:RR 2.41,95%CI 0.90-6.48,p=0.08)的 SR 也有获益趋势,但未达到统计学意义。GEM 为基础的 CRT 组更频繁发生严重急性血液学毒性。

结论

荟萃分析发现,GEM 为基础的 CRT 治疗 LAPC 优于 5-FU 为基础的 CRT,特别是在 12 个月 SR 方面。然而,应仔细考虑急性毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验