Suppr超能文献

[使用哨点监测系统方法监测个性化配药中的用药错误]

[Monitoring medication errors in personalised dispensing using the Sentinel Surveillance System method].

作者信息

Pérez-Cebrián M, Font-Noguera I, Doménech-Moral L, Bosó-Ribelles V, Romero-Boyero P, Poveda-Andrés J L

机构信息

Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España.

出版信息

Farm Hosp. 2011 Jul-Aug;35(4):180-8. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2010.06.004. Epub 2011 May 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of a new quality control strategy based on daily randomised sampling and monitoring a Sentinel Surveillance System (SSS) medication cart, in order to identify medication errors and their origin at different levels of the process.

METHOD

Prospective quality control study with one year follow-up. A SSS medication cart was randomly selected once a week and double-checked before dispensing medication. Medication errors were recorded before it was taken to the relevant hospital ward. Information concerning complaints after receiving medication and 24-hour monitoring were also noted. Type and origin error data were assessed by a Unit Dose Quality Control Group, which proposed relevant improvement measures.

RESULTS

Thirty-four SSS carts were assessed, including 5130 medication lines and 9952 dispensed doses, corresponding to 753 patients. Ninety erroneous lines (1.8%) and 142 mistaken doses (1.4%) were identified at the Pharmacy Department. The most frequent error was dose duplication (38%) and its main cause inappropriate management and forgetfulness (69%). Fifty medication complaints (6.6% of patients) were mainly due to new treatment at admission (52%), and 41 (0.8% of all medication lines), did not completely match the prescription (0.6% lines) as recorded by the Pharmacy Department. Thirty-seven (4.9% of patients) medication complaints due to changes at admission and 32 matching errors (0.6% medication lines) were recorded. The main cause also was inappropriate management and forgetfulness (24%). The simultaneous recording of incidences due to complaints and new medication coincided in 33.3%. In addition, 433 (4.3%) of dispensed doses were returned to the Pharmacy Department. After the Unit Dose Quality Control Group conducted their feedback analysis, 64 improvement measures for Pharmacy Department nurses, 37 for pharmacists, and 24 for the hospital ward were introduced.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSS programme has proven to be useful as a quality control strategy to identify Unit Dose Distribution System errors at initial, intermediate and final stages of the process, improving the involvement of the Pharmacy Department and ward nurses.

摘要

目的

评估基于每日随机抽样和监测哨兵监测系统(SSS)药车的新质量控制策略的效果,以便在流程的不同阶段识别用药错误及其根源。

方法

进行为期一年随访的前瞻性质量控制研究。每周随机选择一辆SSS药车,在发放药品前进行双重检查。在将药品送往相关医院病房之前记录用药错误。还记录了用药后投诉信息和24小时监测情况。单位剂量质量控制小组评估错误类型和根源数据,并提出相关改进措施。

结果

评估了34辆SSS药车,包括5130条用药线路和9952剂发放剂量,对应753名患者。在药房发现90条错误线路(1.8%)和142剂错误剂量(1.4%)。最常见的错误是剂量重复(38%),其主要原因是管理不当和遗忘(69%)。50例用药投诉(占患者的6.6%)主要是由于入院时开始新治疗(52%),41例(占所有用药线路的0.8%)与药房记录的处方不完全匹配(占线路的0.6%)。记录到37例(占患者的4.9%)因入院时情况变化导致的用药投诉和32例匹配错误(占用药线路的0.6%)。主要原因同样是管理不当和遗忘(24%)。因投诉和新用药导致的事件同时记录的情况占33.3%。此外,433剂(4.3%)发放剂量被退回药房。在单位剂量质量控制小组进行反馈分析后,针对药房护士提出了64项改进措施,针对药剂师提出了37项,针对医院病房提出了24项。

结论

事实证明,SSS计划作为一种质量控制策略,在流程的初始、中间和最终阶段识别单位剂量分发系统错误方面很有用,提高了药房和病房护士的参与度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验