Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
Can Fam Physician. 2011 May;57(5):e185-91.
To determine the organizational predictors of higher scores on team climate measures as an indicator of the functioning of a family health team (FHT).
Cross-sectional study using a mailed survey.
Family health teams in Ontario.
Twenty-one of 144 consecutively approached FHTs; 628 team members were surveyed.
Scores on the team climate inventory, which assessed organizational culture type (group, developmental, rational, or hierarchical); leadership perceptions; and organizational factors, such as use of electronic medical records (EMRs), team composition, governance of the FHT, location, meetings, and time since FHT initiation. All analyses were adjusted for clustering of respondents within the FHT using a mixed random-intercepts model.
The response rate was 65.8% (413 of 628); 2 were excluded from analysis, for a total of 411 participants. At the time of survey completion, there was a median of 4 physicians, 11 other health professionals, and 4 management and clerical staff per FHT. The average team climate score was 3.8 out of a possible 5. In multivariable regression analysis, leadership score, group and developmental culture types, and use of more EMR capabilities were associated with higher team climate scores. Other organizational factors, such as number of sites and size of group, were not associated with the team climate score.
Culture, leadership, and EMR functionality, rather than organizational composition of the teams (eg, number of professionals on staff, practice size), were the most important factors in predicting climate in primary care teams.
确定团队氛围措施得分较高的组织预测因素,作为家庭健康团队(FHT)运作的指标。
使用邮寄调查的横断面研究。
安大略省的家庭健康团队。
连续接触的 144 个 FHT 中的 21 个;对 628 名团队成员进行了调查。
团队氛围库存得分,评估组织文化类型(群体、发展、理性或层次);领导感知;以及组织因素,如使用电子病历(EMR)、团队组成、FHT 治理、位置、会议以及 FHT 启动以来的时间。所有分析均使用混合随机截距模型对 FHT 内受访者的聚类进行了调整。
应答率为 65.8%(628 名中的 413 名);有 2 名被排除在分析之外,共 411 名参与者。在调查完成时,每个 FHT 平均有 4 名医生、11 名其他卫生专业人员和 4 名管理和文书人员。平均团队氛围得分为 5 分制中的 3.8 分。在多变量回归分析中,领导评分、群体和发展文化类型以及使用更多 EMR 功能与较高的团队氛围评分相关。其他组织因素,如站点数量和团队规模,与团队氛围评分无关。
文化、领导力和 EMR 功能,而不是团队的组织构成(例如,员工人数、团队规模),是预测初级保健团队氛围的最重要因素。