• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价贝克曼库尔特 UniCel DxH 800 和雅培诊断 Cell-Dyn Sapphire 血液分析仪在三级医院儿科和新生儿标本中的性能。

Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800 and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on pediatric and neonatal specimens in a tertiary care hospital.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jun;135(6):929-38. doi: 10.1309/AJCP2EXNSLGGRVSQ.

DOI:10.1309/AJCP2EXNSLGGRVSQ
PMID:21571966
Abstract

We evaluated the new UniCel DxH 800 hematology analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL) vs the Cell-Dyn Sapphire (Abbott Diagnostics, Santa Clara, CA) using 156 pediatric specimens in Microtainer tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The CBC and differential showed good interinstrument correlation, including WBCs (r = 0.995), RBCs (r = 0.992), hemoglobin (r = 0.998), mean corpuscular volume (r = 0.988), platelets (r = 0.997), neutrophils (r = 0.988), lymphocytes (r = 0.984), monocytes (r = 0.815), eosinophils (r = 0.840), basophils (r = 0.049), and nucleated RBCs (NRBCs; r = 0.906). In the instrument vs 400-cell manual differential comparison, the DxH 800 and Sapphire showed comparable performance for nearly all parameters except for NRBCs, for which the DxH 800 correlated better (r = 0.989) than the Sapphire (r = 0.906). We also compared clinical efficiency by determining whether flagged specimens showed abnormalities on a peripheral blood smear as defined by International Council for Standardization in Haematology criteria. The efficiency of the DxH 800 was 78.0% vs the Sapphire at 68.1%. Both instruments showed identical sensitivity (91.1%), but the specificity for the DxH 800 (71.9%) was higher than that of the Sapphire (57.3%).

摘要

我们使用 Microtainer 管(Becton Dickinson,富兰克林湖,新泽西州)评估了新的 UniCel DxH 800 血液分析仪(贝克曼库尔特,迈阿密,佛罗里达州)与 Cell-Dyn Sapphire(雅培诊断,圣克拉拉,加利福尼亚州)在 156 个儿科标本中的应用。CBC 和差异显示出良好的仪器间相关性,包括白细胞(r = 0.995)、红细胞(r = 0.992)、血红蛋白(r = 0.998)、平均红细胞体积(r = 0.988)、血小板(r = 0.997)、中性粒细胞(r = 0.988)、淋巴细胞(r = 0.984)、单核细胞(r = 0.815)、嗜酸性粒细胞(r = 0.840)、嗜碱性粒细胞(r = 0.049)和有核红细胞(NRBC;r = 0.906)。在仪器与 400 细胞手动差异比较中,DxH 800 和 Sapphire 在几乎所有参数上的性能都相当,除了 NRBC,DxH 800 的相关性更好(r = 0.989),而 Sapphire 的相关性稍差(r = 0.906)。我们还通过确定根据国际血液学标准化委员会标准定义的外周血涂片上标记标本是否显示异常来比较临床效率。DxH 800 的效率为 78.0%,而 Sapphire 的效率为 68.1%。两种仪器的敏感性均为 91.1%,但 DxH 800 的特异性(71.9%)高于 Sapphire(57.3%)。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800 and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on pediatric and neonatal specimens in a tertiary care hospital.评价贝克曼库尔特 UniCel DxH 800 和雅培诊断 Cell-Dyn Sapphire 血液分析仪在三级医院儿科和新生儿标本中的性能。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jun;135(6):929-38. doi: 10.1309/AJCP2EXNSLGGRVSQ.
2
Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800, Beckman Coulter LH 780, and Abbott Diagnostics Cell-Dyn Sapphire hematology analyzers on adult specimens in a tertiary care hospital.评价贝克曼库尔特 UniCel DxH 800、贝克曼库尔特 LH 780 和雅培诊断 Cell-Dyn Sapphire 血液分析仪在一家三级保健医院成人标本中的性能。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jun;135(6):939-51. doi: 10.1309/AJCP1V3UXEIQTSLE.
3
Performance and abnormal cell flagging comparisons of three automated blood cell counters: Cell-Dyn Sapphire, DxH-800, and XN-2000.三种自动化血细胞计数器:Cell-Dyn Sapphire、DxH-800 和 XN-2000 的性能和异常细胞标记比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Dec;140(6):845-52. doi: 10.1309/AJCPE5R4SOQBUULZ.
4
Evaluation of the nucleated red blood cell count in neonates using the Beckman Coulter UniCel DxH 800 analyzer.使用贝克曼库尔特 UniCel DxH 800 分析仪评估新生儿有核红细胞计数。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2011 Dec;33(6):620-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2011.01335.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
5
Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness.比较四种血液学分析仪CELL-DYN Sapphire、ADVIA 120、库尔特LH 750和希森美康XE-2100在临床实用性方面的表现。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2008 Dec;30(6):480-6.
6
Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples.比较 Abbott Sapphire、Siemens Advia 120、Beckman Coulter DxH 800 和 Sysmex XE-2100 对正常和病理样本的自动血细胞计数结果。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 May;139(5):641-50. doi: 10.1309/AJCP7D8ECZRXGWCG.
7
Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.贝克曼库尔特AcT 5 diff AL血液分析仪在医院环境中的评估
Lab Hematol. 2003;9(3):167-74.
8
Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000.在一家大学医院环境中比较五款自动化血液分析仪:雅培 Cell-Dyn Sapphire、贝克曼库尔特 DxH 800、西门子 Advia 2120i、希森美康 XE-5000 和希森美康 XN-2000。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Jun;53(7):1057-71. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0945.
9
Comparison of four automated hematology analyzers.四种自动血液分析仪的比较
Clin Lab Sci. 2001 Fall;14(4):238-42.
10
Aberrant lamellar body counts noted on the Beckman Coulter Unicel DxH 800.贝克曼库尔特 DxH 800 仪器上出现异常板层小体计数。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Mar 9;50(9):1631-3. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0026.