Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1929-34. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821f050b.
Muscle weakness often complicates critical illness and is associated with increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and limiting functional outcome even years later. To assess the presence of muscle weakness and to examine the effects of interventions, objective and reliable muscle strength measurements are required. The first objective of this study is to determine interobserver reliability of handheld dynamometry. Secondary objectives are to quantify muscle weakness, to evaluate distribution of muscle weakness, and to evaluate gender-related differences in muscle strength.
Cross-sectional observational study.
The surgical and medical intensive care units of a large, tertiary referral, university hospital.
A cross-sectional, randomly selected sample of awake and cooperative critically ill patients.
None.
Handheld dynamometry was performed in critically ill patients who had at least a score of 3 (movement against gravity) on the Medical Research Council scale. Three upper limb and three lower limb muscle groups were tested at the right-hand side. Patients were tested twice daily by two independent raters. Fifty-one test-retests were performed in 39 critically ill patients. Handheld dynamometry demonstrated good interobserver agreement with intraclass correlation coefficients >0.90 in four of the muscle groups tested (range, 0.91-0.96) and somewhat less for hip flexion (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.80) and ankle dorsiflexion (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.76). Limb muscle strength was considerably reduced in all muscle groups as shown by the median z-score (range, -1.08 to -3.48 sd units). Elbow flexors, knee extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors were the most affected muscle groups. Loss of muscle strength was comparable between men and women.
Handheld dynamometry is a tool with a very good interobserver reliability to assess limb muscle strength in awake and cooperative critically ill patients. Future studies should focus on the sensitivity of handheld dynamometry in longitudinal studies to evaluate predictive values toward patients' functional outcome.
肌肉无力常使危重病复杂化,并与发病率、死亡率增加以及即使在数年后仍限制功能结局相关。为了评估肌肉无力的存在并检查干预措施的效果,需要进行客观、可靠的肌肉力量测量。本研究的首要目的是确定手持测力计的观察者间可靠性。次要目标是量化肌肉无力,评估肌肉无力的分布,并评估肌肉力量与性别相关的差异。
横断面观察性研究。
一家大型、三级转诊、大学医院的外科和内科重症监护病房。
一组清醒且配合的危重患者的横断面随机抽样。
无。
在医疗研究委员会评分为 3 分(对抗重力运动)的危重患者中进行手持测力计检查。右侧测试了三个上肢和三个下肢肌肉群。由两名独立的评估员每天测试两次。在 39 名危重患者中进行了 51 次测试-复测。在测试的四个肌肉群中,手持测力计显示出良好的观察者间一致性,组内相关系数>0.90(范围为 0.91-0.96),而髋关节屈曲(组内相关系数,0.80)和踝关节背屈(组内相关系数,0.76)的一致性略低。所有肌肉群的肢体肌肉力量均明显降低,中位数 z 评分(范围为-1.08 至-3.48 sd 单位)显示。屈肘肌、伸膝肌和背屈踝肌是受影响最严重的肌肉群。男性和女性的肌肉力量丧失相当。
手持测力计是一种具有很好的观察者间可靠性的工具,可用于评估清醒且配合的危重患者的肢体肌肉力量。未来的研究应集中在手持测力计在纵向研究中的敏感性上,以评估其对患者功能结局的预测价值。