Kreager Derek A, Rulison Kelly, Moody James
Pennsylvania State University.
Criminology. 2011 Feb;49(1):95-127. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00219.x.
Gangs and group-level processes were once central phenomena for criminological theory and research. By the mid-1970's, however, gang research was primarily displaced by studies of individual behavior using randomized self-report surveys, a shift that also removed groups from the theoretical foreground. In this project, we return to the group level to test competing theoretical claims about delinquent group structure. We use network-based clustering methods to identify 897 friendship groups in two ninth grade cohorts of 27 Pennsylvania and Iowa schools. We then relate group-level measures of delinquency and drinking to network measures of group size, friendship reciprocity, transitivity, structural cohesion, stability, average popularity, and network centrality. We find significant negative correlations between group delinquency and all of our network measures, suggesting that delinquent groups are less solidary and less central to school networks than non-delinquent groups. Further analyses, however, reveal that these correlations are primarily explained by other group characteristics, such as gender composition and socioeconomic status. Drinking behaviors, on the other hand, show net positive associations with most of the network measures, suggesting that drinking groups have higher status and are more internally cohesive than non-drinking groups. Our findings shed light on a longstanding criminological debate by suggesting that any structural differences between delinquent and non-delinquent groups may be attributable to other attributes coincidental with delinquency. In contrast, drinking groups appear to provide peer contexts of greater social capital and cohesion.
帮派和群体层面的过程曾是犯罪学理论与研究的核心现象。然而,到20世纪70年代中期,帮派研究主要被使用随机自我报告调查的个体行为研究所取代,这一转变也使群体从理论前沿消失。在这个项目中,我们回到群体层面,以检验关于犯罪群体结构的相互竞争的理论主张。我们使用基于网络的聚类方法,在宾夕法尼亚州和爱荷华州27所学校的两个九年级队列中识别出897个友谊群体。然后,我们将群体层面的犯罪和饮酒测量指标与群体规模、友谊互惠性、传递性、结构凝聚力、稳定性、平均受欢迎程度和网络中心性的网络测量指标联系起来。我们发现群体犯罪与我们所有的网络测量指标之间存在显著的负相关,这表明犯罪群体比非犯罪群体在学校网络中凝聚力更弱且更不处于中心位置。然而,进一步的分析表明,这些相关性主要由其他群体特征来解释,比如性别构成和社会经济地位。另一方面,饮酒行为与大多数网络测量指标呈现出净正相关,这表明饮酒群体比非饮酒群体具有更高的地位且内部凝聚力更强。我们的研究结果为一场长期存在的犯罪学辩论提供了线索,表明犯罪群体和非犯罪群体之间的任何结构差异可能归因于与犯罪同时出现的其他属性。相比之下,饮酒群体似乎提供了具有更大社会资本和凝聚力的同伴环境。