Suppr超能文献

高丰度蛋白质去除与低丰度蛋白质富集:减少血浆蛋白质组复杂性方法的比较。

High abundance proteins depletion vs low abundance proteins enrichment: comparison of methods to reduce the plasma proteome complexity.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Metabolism, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011 May 4;6(5):e19603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019603.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, the complexity of the plasma proteome exceeds the analytical capacity of conventional approaches to isolate lower abundance proteins that may prove to be informative biomarkers. Only complex multistep separation strategies have been able to detect a substantial number of low abundance proteins (<100 ng/ml). The first step of these protocols is generally the depletion of high abundance proteins by the use of immunoaffinity columns or, alternatively, the enrichment of by the use of solid phase hexapeptides ligand libraries.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we present a direct comparison of these two approaches. Following either approach, the plasma sample was further fractionated by SCX chromatography and analyzed by RP-LC-MS/MS with a Q-TOF mass spectrometer. The depletion of the 20 most abundant plasma proteins allowed the identification of about 25% more proteins than those detectable following low abundance proteins enrichment. The two datasets are partially overlapping and the identified proteins belong to the same order of magnitude in terms of plasma concentration.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results show that the two approaches give complementary results. However, the enrichment of low abundance proteins has the great advantage of obtaining much larger amount of material that can be used for further fractionations and analyses and emerges also as a cheaper and technically simpler approach. Collectively, these data indicate that the enrichment approach seems more suitable as the first stage of a complex multi-step fractionation protocol.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,血浆蛋白质组的复杂性超过了传统方法分离低丰度蛋白质的分析能力,而这些低丰度蛋白质可能被证明是有意义的生物标志物。只有复杂的多步分离策略才能检测到大量的低丰度蛋白质(<100ng/ml)。这些方案的第一步通常是使用免疫亲和柱去除高丰度蛋白质,或者使用固相六肽配体文库进行富集。

方法/主要发现:在这里,我们对这两种方法进行了直接比较。采用任一种方法后,血浆样品进一步通过 SCX 色谱分离,并通过 Q-TOF 质谱仪与 RP-LC-MS/MS 进行分析。20 种最丰富的血浆蛋白质的去除允许鉴定出比低丰度蛋白质富集后可检测到的蛋白质多约 25%。这两个数据集部分重叠,所鉴定的蛋白质在血浆浓度方面属于同一数量级。

结论/意义:我们的结果表明,这两种方法给出了互补的结果。然而,低丰度蛋白质的富集具有获得更多可用于进一步分离和分析的物质的巨大优势,并且也作为一种更便宜和技术上更简单的方法出现。总的来说,这些数据表明,富集方法似乎更适合作为复杂多步分离方案的第一阶段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a93/3087803/c2eb749ca562/pone.0019603.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验