Suppr超能文献

儿童类别测试第 2 级在混合学龄儿童样本中的临床有效性。

Clinical validity of the children's category test-level 2 in a mixed sample of school-aged children.

机构信息

Roosevelt University, 430 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Jun;26(4):331-9. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr031. Epub 2011 May 15.

Abstract

The Children's Category Test (CCT) is a widely used measure of problem solving with adequate psychometric properties. Yet, Shriver and Vacc (n.d.) were fairly critical of the CCT in The Mental Measurement Yearbook and highlighted its limitations. Thus, to explore the clinical validity of the widely used CCT-Level 2 (CCT-2) version, results of that test were analyzed post hoc in a sample of 265 children with mixed etiology referred for neuropsychological testing at a private outpatient laboratory. Overall, the CCT-2 correctly classified 57.7% of the sample, with 72.2% accuracy in classifying the Neuropsychologically Normal Clinical Comparison group but only 54% for the Brain Injured group. Predictive power was further reduced when the Brain Injury group was subdivided. Predictive power fell to 27.2%, with the best predictions coming for the Mental Retardation (MR) group (58.3%) and the lowest for the Learning Disorder NOS group (2.5%). The current findings suggest that the CCT's clinical application should be used with caution.

摘要

儿童分类测验(CCT)是一种广泛使用的解决问题的测量方法,具有足够的心理测量学特性。然而,Shriver 和 Vacc(未注明日期)在《心理测量年鉴》中对 CCT 进行了相当严厉的批评,并强调了它的局限性。因此,为了探索广泛使用的 CCT-2 版本的临床有效性,对在私人门诊实验室进行神经心理测试的 265 名混合病因儿童的样本进行了事后分析。总体而言,CCT-2 正确分类了 57.7%的样本,在分类神经心理正常临床对照组时准确率为 72.2%,但在脑损伤组中准确率仅为 54%。当将脑损伤组进一步细分时,预测能力进一步降低。预测能力下降到 27.2%,其中智力迟钝(MR)组的预测最好(58.3%),学习障碍NOS 组的预测最差(2.5%)。目前的研究结果表明,CCT 的临床应用应谨慎使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验