Bello Danielle T, Allen Daniel N, Mayfield Joan
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada Las Vegas, United States.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 May;23(3):329-39. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
The current study examined the psychometric properties and sensitivity to brain dysfunction of a popular test of abstraction and problem solving ability, the Children's Category Test Level 2 (CCT-2; Boll, 1993). Participants were 113 children with various forms of structural brain damage (n=82) or with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (n=31). Results indicated that while there is some support for the validity of the CCT-2, the test is not particularly sensitive to brain dysfunction. The composite T-score, subtest scores and factor scores did not distinguish children with ADHD from those with structural brain damage and the T-scores of both groups were within the normal range. These results illustrate the importance of validating measures of neurocognitive function with clinical populations as even tests with otherwise excellent psychometric properties may not be sensitive to brain dysfunction. It is recommended that the CCT-2 not be used to draw conclusions regarding the impact of brain damage on abstraction and problem solving abilities.
本研究考察了一项广受欢迎的抽象与问题解决能力测试——儿童类别测试二级(CCT - 2;博尔,1993年)的心理测量特性及其对脑功能障碍的敏感性。参与者为113名患有各种形式结构性脑损伤的儿童(n = 82)或患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的儿童(n = 31)。结果表明,虽然有一些证据支持CCT - 2的有效性,但该测试对脑功能障碍并不特别敏感。综合T分数、子测试分数和因子分数无法区分患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的儿童和患有结构性脑损伤的儿童,且两组的T分数均在正常范围内。这些结果说明了用临床人群验证神经认知功能测量方法的重要性,因为即使是具有其他优秀心理测量特性的测试,也可能对脑功能障碍不敏感。建议不要使用CCT - 2得出关于脑损伤对抽象和问题解决能力影响的结论。