• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达比加群酯治疗心房颤动的长期多中心观察性研究(RELY-ABLE 研究)。

The Long-Term Multicenter Observational Study of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) Study.

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton,

出版信息

Circulation. 2013 Jul 16;128(3):237-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001139. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001139
PMID:23770747
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During follow-up of between 1 and 3 years in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial, 2 doses of dabigatran etexilate were shown to be effective and safe for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. There is a need for longer-term follow-up of patients on dabigatran and for further data comparing the 2 dabigatran doses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients randomly assigned to dabigatran in RE-LY were eligible for the Long-term Multicenter Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) trial if they had not permanently discontinued study medication at the time of their final RE-LY study visit. Enrolled patients continued to receive the double-blind dabigatran dose received in RE-LY, for up to 28 months of follow up after RE-LY (median follow-up, 2.3 years). There were 5851 patients enrolled, representing 48% of patients originally randomly assigned to receive dabigatran in RE-LY and 86% of RELY-ABLE-eligible patients. Rates of stroke or systemic embolism were 1.46% and 1.60%/y on dabigatran 150 and 110 mg twice daily, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.20). Rates of major hemorrhage were 3.74% and 2.99%/y on dabigatran 150 and 110 mg (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.53). Rates of death were 3.02% and 3.10%/y (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.19). Rates of hemorrhagic stroke were 0.13% and 0.14%/y.

CONCLUSIONS

During 2.3 years of continued treatment with dabigatran after RE-LY, there was a higher rate of major bleeding with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily in comparison with 110 mg, and similar rates of stroke and death.

摘要

背景

在随机评估长期抗凝治疗(RE-LY)试验的 1 至 3 年随访期间,达比加群酯的 2 种剂量被证明对预防房颤患者的中风或全身性栓塞是有效且安全的。需要对达比加群的患者进行更长时间的随访,并需要进一步的数据来比较 2 种达比加群剂量。

方法和结果

如果在 RE-LY 的最后一次研究访视时未永久停用研究药物,RE-LY 中的随机分配至达比加群的患者有资格参加房颤患者长期多中心达比加群治疗扩展试验(RELY-ABLE)。入组患者继续接受 RE-LY 中接受的双盲达比加群剂量,最长随访 28 个月(中位随访时间 2.3 年)。共纳入 5851 例患者,占最初随机分配至接受 RE-LY 中达比加群治疗的患者的 48%和 RELY-ABLE 合格患者的 86%。达比加群 150mg 每日 2 次和 110mg 每日 2 次的中风或全身性栓塞发生率分别为 1.46%和 1.60%/年(风险比,0.91;95%置信区间,0.69-1.20)。达比加群 150mg 每日 2 次和 110mg 每日 2 次的大出血发生率分别为 3.74%和 2.99%/年(风险比,1.26;95%置信区间,1.04-1.53)。死亡率分别为 3.02%和 3.10%/年(风险比,0.97;95%置信区间,0.80-1.19)。出血性中风发生率分别为 0.13%和 0.14%/年。

结论

在 RE-LY 后继续使用达比加群治疗 2.3 年期间,达比加群 150mg 每日 2 次的大出血发生率高于 110mg 每日 2 次,且中风和死亡率相似。

相似文献

1
The Long-Term Multicenter Observational Study of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) Study.达比加群酯治疗心房颤动的长期多中心观察性研究(RELY-ABLE 研究)。
Circulation. 2013 Jul 16;128(3):237-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001139. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
2
The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: the RE-LY Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy).达比加群血浆浓度和患者特征对房颤患者缺血性卒中和大出血发生率的影响:RE-LY 试验(随机评估长期抗凝治疗)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 4;63(4):321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.104. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
3
Modeling of the impact on health outcomes of the use of dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation.评估房颤患者使用达比加群对健康结局影响的建模研究。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(4):320-6. doi: 10.1159/000347074. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
4
Balancing the benefits and risks of 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in atrial fibrillation.比较达比加群酯与华法林在心房颤动中两剂的获益与风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 3;62(10):900-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
New evidences for old concerns with oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: focus on dabigatran.新证据引发对房颤抗凝治疗的旧有担忧:关注达比加群。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012 Dec;13(18):2649-61. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2012.749860. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
6
Dabigatran for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: focus in the geriatric population.达比加群酯用于非瓣膜性心房颤动的卒中预防:聚焦老年人群
Consult Pharm. 2014 Mar;29(3):169-78. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.169.
7
Benefit-risk assessment of dabigatran in the treatment of stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.达比加群酯用于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者预防卒中的获益-风险评估
Drug Saf. 2014 May;37(5):295-307. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0151-1.
8
Efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation--sub-analysis in Japanese population in RE-LY trial.达比加群酯与华法林在房颤患者中的疗效和安全性 - RE-LY 试验中日本人群的亚组分析。
Circ J. 2011;75(4):800-5. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-11-0191. Epub 2011 Mar 19.
9
Risks for stroke, bleeding, and death in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dabigatran or warfarin in relation to the CHADS2 score: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial.在接受达比加群或华法林治疗的房颤患者中,与 CHADS2 评分相关的卒中和出血风险及死亡率:RE-LY 试验的亚组分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):660-7, W204. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00004.
10
Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial.与华法林相比,达比加群酯在老年和年轻房颤患者中使用 2 剂的出血风险:随机长期抗凝治疗评估(RE-LY)试验分析。
Circulation. 2011 May 31;123(21):2363-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004747. Epub 2011 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the morbidity of efficacy endpoints and bleeding events in elderly and young patients treated with the same dose rivaroxaban.一项系统评价和荟萃分析显示,使用相同剂量利伐沙班治疗的老年和年轻患者在疗效终点和出血事件方面的发病率。
Ann Hematol. 2024 Nov;103(11):4363-4373. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-05767-z. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Being precise with anticoagulation to reduce adverse drug reactions: are we there yet?精准抗凝以减少药物不良反应:我们做到了吗?
Pharmacogenomics J. 2024 Mar 5;24(2):7. doi: 10.1038/s41397-024-00329-y.
3
Turkish Real Life Atrial Fibrillation in Clinical Practice: TRAFFIC Study.
土耳其临床实践中的真实生活心房颤动:TRAFFIC研究。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2024 Jan 7;28(2):87-93. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3616.
4
Left atrial appendage occlusion in an older population cohort.老年患者人群中的左心耳封堵术。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):2707-2712. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03346-1. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
5
No Association between Gastrointestinal Rebleeding and DOAC Therapy Resumption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胃肠道再出血与直接口服抗凝剂治疗恢复之间无关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 14;11(2):554. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020554.
6
Left atrial appendage exclusion in atrial fibrillation.心房颤动中的左心耳封堵术
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 13;9:949732. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.949732. eCollection 2022.
7
Recent advances in the management of transient ischemic attacks.短暂性脑缺血发作治疗的最新进展
Fac Rev. 2022 Jul 22;11:19. doi: 10.12703/r/11-19. eCollection 2022.
8
Adherence to Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients Attending a Multidisciplinary Thrombosis Service in Canada - A Cross-Sectional Survey.加拿大多学科血栓形成服务机构患者对抗血栓治疗的依从性——一项横断面调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Jul 26;16:1771-1780. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S367105. eCollection 2022.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Non-recommended Dose of New Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非推荐剂量新型口服抗凝药用于心房颤动患者的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 23;8:774109. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.774109. eCollection 2021.
10
Differential Presentations of Arterial Thromboembolic Events Between Venous Thromboembolism and Atrial Fibrillation Patients.静脉血栓栓塞症和心房颤动患者动脉血栓栓塞事件的不同表现
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 6;8:775564. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.775564. eCollection 2021.