• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言之间的空间。

Space between languages.

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Louisiana at Lafayette.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;32(7):1177-99. doi: 10.1080/03640210802152335.

DOI:10.1080/03640210802152335
PMID:21585448
Abstract

What aspects of spatial relations influence speakers' choice of locative? This article presents a study of static spatial descriptions from 24 languages. The study reveals two kinds of spatial terms evident cross-linguistically: specific spatial terms and general spatial terms (GSTs). Whereas specific spatial terms-including English prepositions-occur in a limited range of situations, with concomitant specificity in their meaning, GSTs occur in all spatial descriptions (in languages that employ them). Because of the extreme differences in range of application, the two are considered separately. A multidimensional scaling analysis is used with specific spatial terms to extract statistically valid similarities across the languages sampled. For GSTs, which have not been previously analyzed in the literature, a semantic analysis is proposed and experimentally validated. The results suggest the importance of geometry, function, and qualitative physics to the meanings of both kinds of spatial terms, although the details differ.

摘要

空间关系的哪些方面会影响说话者对处所的选择?本文研究了来自 24 种语言的静态空间描述。研究揭示了两种在跨语言中明显存在的空间术语:特定空间术语和一般空间术语(GST)。虽然特定空间术语——包括英语介词——只出现在有限的情况下,其含义也具有特定性,但 GST 出现在所有空间描述中(在使用它们的语言中)。由于应用范围的极端差异,这两者被分别考虑。多维标度分析用于特定空间术语,以从抽样语言中提取统计上有效的相似性。对于以前在文献中没有分析过的 GST,提出了一种语义分析并进行了实验验证。结果表明,几何形状、功能和定性物理对这两种空间术语的含义都很重要,尽管细节有所不同。

相似文献

1
Space between languages.语言之间的空间。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;32(7):1177-99. doi: 10.1080/03640210802152335.
2
The spatial and temporal meanings of English prepositions can be independently impaired.英语介词的空间和时间意义可能会受到独立损害。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(5):797-806. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.025.
3
The semantics of space: integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience.空间的语义学:融合语言类型学与认知神经科学
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(9):1607-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.025. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
4
A double dissociation between linguistic and perceptual representations of spatial relationships.空间关系的语言和知觉表征之间的双重分离。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Jul 1;17(5):393-414. doi: 10.1080/026432900410766.
5
Attention to endpoints: a cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning.关注端点:空间意义的跨语言限制。
Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul 8;31(4):705-19. doi: 10.1080/15326900701399954.
6
Pragmatics and spatial language: The acquisition of front and back.语用学和空间语言:前后的习得。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Apr;55(4):729-744. doi: 10.1037/dev0000663. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
7
Neuroanatomical correlates of locative prepositions.定位前置词的神经解剖学相关性。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004 Oct;21(7):719-49. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000627.
8
Neural correlates of locative prepositions.方位介词的神经关联
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1576-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.022. Epub 2008 Jan 5.
9
Language-specific and universal influences in children's syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: a comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish.儿童对方式和路径的句法组合中特定语言和普遍影响:英语、日语和土耳其语的比较
Cognition. 2007 Jan;102(1):16-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
10
A double dissociation between the meanings of action verbs and locative prepositions.动作动词含义与方位介词含义之间的双重分离。
Neurocase. 2003 Oct;9(5):421-35. doi: 10.1076/neur.9.5.421.16551.

引用本文的文献

1
Human languages with greater information density have higher communication speed but lower conversation breadth.人类语言的信息密度越大,其交流速度就越快,但对话广度就越低。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Apr;8(4):644-656. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01815-w. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
2
Spatial cognition through the lens of spatial language.
Cogn Process. 2009 Sep;10 Suppl 2:S212-4. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0291-x.