Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University.
Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;33(2):243-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01011.x.
A central controversy in cognitive science concerns the roles of rules versus similarity. To gain some leverage on this problem, we propose that rule- versus similarity-based processes can be characterized as extremes in a multidimensional space that is composed of at least two dimensions: the number of features (Pothos, 2005) and the physical presence of features. The transition of similarity- to rule-based processing is conceptualized as a transition in this space. To illustrate this, we show how a neural network model uses input features (and in this sense produces similarity-based responses) when it has a low learning rate or in the early phases of training, but it switches to using self-generated, more abstract features (and in this sense produces rule-based responses) when it has a higher learning rate or is in the later phases of training. Relations with categorization and the psychology of learning are pointed out.
认知科学中的一个核心争议涉及规则与相似性的作用。为了在这个问题上取得一些进展,我们提出基于规则和基于相似性的过程可以被描述为由至少两个维度组成的多维空间中的极端:特征的数量(波索斯,2005)和特征的物理存在。从相似性到基于规则的处理的转变被概念化为这个空间中的转变。为了说明这一点,我们展示了神经网络模型如何在学习率低或训练早期阶段使用输入特征(因此产生基于相似性的响应),但在学习率较高或训练后期阶段时,它切换到使用自我生成的、更抽象的特征(因此产生基于规则的响应)。还指出了与分类和学习心理学的关系。