Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 May 17;11:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-69.
Following the expansion of the European Union, there has been a large influx of Central and East European (CEE) migrants to the UK. CEE men who have sex with men (MSM) represent a small minority within this population that are none-the-less important to capture in sexual health research among the CEE migrant community. This paper examines the feasibility of recruiting CEE MSM for a survey of sexual behaviour in London using respondent driven sampling (RDS), via gay websites and in GUM clinics.
We sought CEE MSM to start RDS chain referral among GUM clinic attendees, our personal contacts and at gay events and venues in central London. We recruited CEE MSM (n = 485) via two popular websites for gay men in Britain (March-May 2009) and at two central London GUM clinics (n = 51) (July 2008-March 2009).
We found seventeen men who knew other CEE MSM in London and agreed to recruit contacts into the study. These men recruited only three men into the study, none of whom recruited any further respondents, and RDS was abandoned after 7 months (July 2008-January 2009). Half of the men that we approached to participate in RDS did not know any other CEE MSM in London. Men who agreed to recruit contacts for RDS were rather more likely to have been in the UK for more than one year (94.1% vs 70.0%, p = 0.052). Men recruited through gay websites and from GUM clinics were similar.
The Internet was the most successful method for collecting data on sexual risk behaviour among CEE MSM in London. CEE MSM in London were not well networked. RDS may also have failed because they did not fully understand the procedure and/or the financial incentive was not sufficient motivation to take part.
随着欧盟的扩张,大量中东欧(CEE)移民涌入英国。在这一人群中,与男性发生性关系的男同性恋者(MSM)只占一小部分,但对于 CEE 移民社区的性健康研究来说,他们是非常重要的。本文通过同性恋网站和 GUM 诊所,考察了使用基于应答者驱动抽样(RDS)在伦敦对 CEE MSM 进行性行为调查的可行性。
我们试图让 GUM 诊所的 CEE MSM 参与者在我们的个人联系人中以及在伦敦市中心的同性恋活动和场所中启动 RDS 链式转介。我们通过英国两家热门的男同性恋者网站(2009 年 3 月至 5 月)和伦敦两家 GUM 诊所(2008 年 7 月至 2009 年 3 月)招募 CEE MSM(n=485)。
我们找到了 17 名在伦敦认识其他 CEE MSM 的男性,他们同意招募联系人参加这项研究。这些人只招募了 3 人参加研究,其中没有人招募到更多的受访者,RDS 在 7 个月后(2008 年 7 月至 2009 年 1 月)被放弃。我们接触到的参加 RDS 的人中,有一半人不知道伦敦有其他 CEE MSM。同意招募联系人参加 RDS 的人在英国的时间往往超过一年(94.1%比 70.0%,p=0.052)。通过同性恋网站和 GUM 诊所招募的人情况相似。
互联网是在伦敦收集 CEE MSM 性风险行为数据的最有效方法。伦敦的 CEE MSM 社交网络并不发达。RDS 也可能失败,因为他们不完全理解程序,或者财务激励不足以促使他们参加。