Suppr超能文献

心脏骤停后幸存者治疗性低温期间床边寒战评估量表与衍生的肌电图功率的相关性。

Association of the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale and derived EMG power during therapeutic hypothermia in survivors of cardiac arrest.

机构信息

Maine Medical Center Neuroscience Institute and Department of Critical Care Services, United States.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2011 Aug;82(8):1100-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.03.037. Epub 2011 Apr 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Shivering during therapeutic hypothermia (TH) after cardiac arrest (CA) is common, but the optimal means of detection and appropriate threshold for treatment are not established. In an effort to develop a quantitative, continuous tool to measure shivering, we hypothesized that continuous derived electromyography (dEMG) power detected by the Aspect A2000 or VISTA monitor would correlate with the intermittent Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale (BSAS) performed by nurses.

METHODS

Among 38 patients treated with TH after CA, 853 hourly BSAS measurements were compared to dEMG power measured every minute by a frontal surface electrode. Patients received intermittent vecuronium by protocol to treat clinically recognized shivering (BSAS>0). Mean dEMG power in decibels (dB) was determined for the hour preceding each BSAS measurement. dEMG and BSAS were compared using ANOVA.

RESULTS

The median dEMG power for a BSAS score of 0 (no shivering) was 27 dB (IQR 26-31 dB), BSAS 1 was 30.5 dB (IQR 28-35 dB), BSAS 2 was 34 dB (IQR 30-38 dB), and BSAS 3 was 34.5 dB (IQR 32-44.25). The dEMG for BSAS≥1 (shivering) was statistically different from BSAS 0 (p<0.0001). dEMG and BSAS correlated moderately (r=0.66, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

dEMG power measured from the forehead with the Aspect A2000 or VISTA monitor during therapeutic hypothermia correlated with the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale. Given its continuous trending of dEMG power, the A2000 or VISTA may be a useful research and clinical tool for objectively monitoring shivering.

摘要

简介

心脏骤停(CA)后治疗性低温(TH)期间出现颤抖较为常见,但尚未确定最佳检测方法和治疗阈值。为了开发一种定量、连续的工具来测量颤抖,我们假设通过Aspect A2000 或 VISTA 监测仪检测到的连续衍生肌电图(dEMG)功率与由护士进行的间歇性床边颤抖评估量表(BSAS)相关。

方法

在 38 例接受 CA 后 TH 治疗的患者中,比较了 853 次每小时 BSAS 测量值与通过额表面电极每分钟测量的 dEMG 功率。根据协议,患者间歇性接受维库溴铵以治疗临床识别的颤抖(BSAS>0)。在进行每个 BSAS 测量之前的每小时确定平均 dEMG 功率(分贝(dB))。使用 ANOVA 比较 dEMG 和 BSAS。

结果

BSAS 评分为 0(无颤抖)的中位数 dEMG 功率为 27 dB(IQR 26-31 dB),BSAS 1 为 30.5 dB(IQR 28-35 dB),BSAS 2 为 34 dB(IQR 30-38 dB),BSAS 3 为 34.5 dB(IQR 32-44.25)。BSAS≥1(颤抖)的 dEMG 与 BSAS 0 有统计学差异(p<0.0001)。dEMG 和 BSAS 中度相关(r=0.66,p<0.001)。

结论

在治疗性低温期间,通过 Aspect A2000 或 VISTA 监测仪从额头上测量的 dEMG 功率与床边颤抖评估量表相关。鉴于其 dEMG 功率的连续趋势,A2000 或 VISTA 可能是一种有用的研究和临床工具,可用于客观监测颤抖。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验