Duke University Health System in Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Am J Crit Care. 2013 Jan;22(1):70-4. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013907.
Since its early development, the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale (BSAS) has had only initial psychometric testing. Before this instrument is incorporated into routine practice, its interrater reliability should be explored in a diverse group of practitioners.
This prospective nonrandomized study used a panel of 5 observers who completed 100 paired assessments. Observers independently scored patients for shivering by using the BSAS. Kappa statistics were determined by using SAS version 9.4 with BSAS scores treated as ordinal data.
A weighted kappa value of 0.48 from 100 paired observations of 22 patients indicates moderate agreement of the BSAS scores. Most of the BSAS scores were 0 or 1; dichotomizing shivering as little or no shivering versus significant shivering resulted in a kappa of 0.66 (substantial agreement). No relationship was found between timing of assessment or the role of the practitioner and the likelihood of both observers assigning the same BSAS score.
The BSAS has adequate interrater reliability to be considered for use among a diverse group of practitioners.
自早期开发以来,床边颤抖评估量表(BSAS)仅进行了初步的心理测量测试。在将该工具纳入常规实践之前,应该在不同的从业者群体中探索其评分者间信度。
本前瞻性非随机研究使用了一个由 5 名观察者组成的小组,他们完成了 100 对评估。观察者通过 BSAS 独立对患者的颤抖情况进行评分。使用 SAS 版本 9.4 确定 Kappa 统计量,将 BSAS 评分视为有序数据。
22 名患者的 100 对观察中加权 Kappa 值为 0.48,表明 BSAS 评分具有中度一致性。大多数 BSAS 评分为 0 或 1;将颤抖分为轻度或无颤抖与明显颤抖相比,Kappa 值为 0.66(高度一致)。评估时间或从业者角色与观察者分配相同 BSAS 评分的可能性之间没有关系。
BSAS 具有足够的评分者间信度,可以考虑在不同的从业者群体中使用。