Suppr超能文献

床旁寒战评估量表的组内信度。

Interrater reliability of the bedside shivering assessment scale.

机构信息

Duke University Health System in Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2013 Jan;22(1):70-4. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013907.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since its early development, the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale (BSAS) has had only initial psychometric testing. Before this instrument is incorporated into routine practice, its interrater reliability should be explored in a diverse group of practitioners.

METHODS

This prospective nonrandomized study used a panel of 5 observers who completed 100 paired assessments. Observers independently scored patients for shivering by using the BSAS. Kappa statistics were determined by using SAS version 9.4 with BSAS scores treated as ordinal data.

RESULTS

A weighted kappa value of 0.48 from 100 paired observations of 22 patients indicates moderate agreement of the BSAS scores. Most of the BSAS scores were 0 or 1; dichotomizing shivering as little or no shivering versus significant shivering resulted in a kappa of 0.66 (substantial agreement). No relationship was found between timing of assessment or the role of the practitioner and the likelihood of both observers assigning the same BSAS score.

CONCLUSION

The BSAS has adequate interrater reliability to be considered for use among a diverse group of practitioners.

摘要

背景

自早期开发以来,床边颤抖评估量表(BSAS)仅进行了初步的心理测量测试。在将该工具纳入常规实践之前,应该在不同的从业者群体中探索其评分者间信度。

方法

本前瞻性非随机研究使用了一个由 5 名观察者组成的小组,他们完成了 100 对评估。观察者通过 BSAS 独立对患者的颤抖情况进行评分。使用 SAS 版本 9.4 确定 Kappa 统计量,将 BSAS 评分视为有序数据。

结果

22 名患者的 100 对观察中加权 Kappa 值为 0.48,表明 BSAS 评分具有中度一致性。大多数 BSAS 评分为 0 或 1;将颤抖分为轻度或无颤抖与明显颤抖相比,Kappa 值为 0.66(高度一致)。评估时间或从业者角色与观察者分配相同 BSAS 评分的可能性之间没有关系。

结论

BSAS 具有足够的评分者间信度,可以考虑在不同的从业者群体中使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验