• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Residential long-term care: public solutions to access and quality problems.

作者信息

Jansen Irene

机构信息

Canadian Union of Public Employees.

出版信息

Healthc Pap. 2011;10(4):8-22. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2011.22186.

DOI:10.12927/hcpap.2011.22186
PMID:21593611
Abstract

Residential long-term care in Canada is characterized by unequal access and quality problems largely due to inadequate public funding and regulation, commercial involvement and its exclusion from medicare. Programs are patchwork, with variations across provinces in the availability of services, level of public funding, eligibility criteria and out-of-pocket costs borne by residents. Most provinces have cut long-term care bed capacity relative to the senior population in the past decade, without sufficiently expanding home and community care or adequately increasing staffing to reflect the higher acuity of the remaining residents. As a result, care is often rushed and underfunded, with poor working conditions leading to poor quality of care and quality of life for residents. This relationship between workers' and residents' well-being is well documented but poorly addressed. Also well researched but rarely reported are the negative impacts of privatization, at all levels: financing, ownership, management and delivery. This article describes the state of residential long-term care in Canada and proposes three policy directions: creating a pan-Canadian long-term care program, improving quality and reversing privatization.

摘要

相似文献

1
Residential long-term care: public solutions to access and quality problems.
Healthc Pap. 2011;10(4):8-22. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2011.22186.
2
What does quality look like to the resident?对住院医生来说,质量看起来是什么样的?
Healthc Pap. 2011;10(4):24-9; discussion 58-62. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2011.22187.
3
Finding a model that supports quality.找到一个支持质量的模型。
Healthc Pap. 2011;10(4):30-4; discussion 58-62. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2011.22188.
4
The long term care insurance law in Japan: impact on institutional care facilities.日本的长期护理保险法:对机构护理设施的影响。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;18(3):217-21. doi: 10.1002/gps.818.
5
Public funding for long-term care services for older people in residential care settings.为居住在护理机构中的老年人提供长期护理服务的公共资金。
Policy Brief (Cent Home Care Policy Res). 2005 Fall(23):1-5.
6
Creating a quality assurance program for long-term care.创建长期护理质量保证计划。
Health Prog. 1987 Nov;68(9):47-8, 51.
7
Integrated Payment And Delivery Models Offer Opportunities And Challenges For Residential Care Facilities.综合支付与交付模式为住宿护理机构带来了机遇与挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1650-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0330.
8
Oral healthcare access and adequacy in alternative long-term care facilities.替代性长期护理机构中的口腔保健服务可及性与充分性
Spec Care Dentist. 2010 May-Jun;30(3):85-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2010.00132.x.
9
Exploring the ecology of Canada's publicly funded residential long-term care bed supply.探索加拿大公共资助的长期护理床位供应的生态情况。
Can J Aging. 2015 Mar;34(1):60-74. doi: 10.1017/S071498081400052X. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
10
Residential care facilities: a key sector in the spectrum of long-term care providers in the United States.寄宿护理机构:美国长期护理服务提供商体系中的一个关键领域。
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Dec(78):1-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying models of care to support residents in long-term care homes (LTCHs) both during and beyond COVID-19.确定在新冠疫情期间及之后为长期护理院(LTCHs)的居民提供支持的护理模式。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 20;20(8):e0329255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329255. eCollection 2025.
2
Developing an evidence-informed model of long-term life care at home for older adults with medical, functional and/or social care needs in Ontario, Canada: a mixed methods study protocol.在加拿大安大略省为有医疗、功能和/或社会护理需求的老年人群开发基于证据的家庭长期生活护理模型:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 11;12(8):e060339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060339.
3
A mixed methods quality improvement study to implement nurse practitioner roles and improve care for residents in long-term care facilities.
一项混合方法质量改进研究,旨在落实执业护士角色并改善长期护理机构中居民的护理服务。
BMC Nurs. 2020 Jan 29;19:6. doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0395-2. eCollection 2020.
4
Importance of Team Functioning as a Target of Quality Improvement Initiatives in Nursing Homes: A Qualitative Process Evaluation.团队运作作为养老院质量改进举措目标的重要性:一项定性过程评估
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2019 Winter;39(1):21-28. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000238.
5
How well does the minimum data set measure healthcare use? a validation study.最小数据集对医疗保健使用情况的衡量效果如何?一项验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3089-7.
6
Does regulating private long-term care facilities lead to better care? A study from Quebec, Canada.对私立长期护理机构进行监管会带来更好的护理服务吗?一项来自加拿大魁北克的研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Jun;26(3):330-6. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu032. Epub 2014 Apr 15.